Quote:
Originally Posted by The Donosaur I actually have no problem with what is considered stalling. If your opponent isn't doing enough from the bottom to get you to want to advance positions then why take a risk? Why risk losing your already dominate position to get an even more dominate position if your opponent isn't throwing throwing up subs, striking from the bottom, or trying to get up? You are already winning so it should be their job to try to change that? It is mixed martial arts, if you suck at one of the martial arts then that should be exposed. It is a sport, entertaining people is just a side effect of it. I know somebody is gonna mention something about if it wasn't entertaining then nobody would watch, and the company would fail. That is true, but if all the fighters with gaping holes in their games got exposed, and eventually cut then it wouldn't be a problem. |
The point is, they allocate way too many points to fighters who utilize techniques that don't do damage. Infact, it's heavily slanted in favor of people who lay n pray. Case in point, King no vs Mousassi. If you aren't advancing position or dealing out damage, then you should not get points.
__________________
Jones Era >> Machida Era
Favorite fighters: Anderson Silva, Jon Jones, BJ Penn, Melvin Gulliard, Jose Aldo, Dominic Cruz