View Single Post
Old 01-28-2013, 10:05 AM   #29 (permalink)
H0SS
Reputation: ∞
 
H0SS's Avatar
 
Status: Champion
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 2,002

H0SS will have their jersey retired.H0SS will have their jersey retired.H0SS will have their jersey retired.H0SS will have their jersey retired.H0SS will have their jersey retired.H0SS will have their jersey retired.H0SS will have their jersey retired.H0SS will have their jersey retired.H0SS will have their jersey retired.H0SS will have their jersey retired.H0SS will have their jersey retired.



Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kalebarker View Post
It's not a disadvantageous position for the fighter on the bottom if the fighter on top is constantly defending sub attempts. The guy on bottom is the one that is attacking and the only one threatening.
It is considered a disadvantageous position in MMA, especially if the other fighter put you down in that position. It is considered a neutral position in BJJ, but I think that is due to the inability to throw strikes. In MMA, the position favors the guy on top because keeping him down limits your opponent to the grappling aspect of MMA.
__________________
Damn.
H0SS is offline   Reply With Quote