Originally Posted by rivethead
No, you're making the same mistake the other mope did.
I said Okami was his best fight in almost 5 years. Note that I said "almost," not "it was his best fight in 5 years." It's been almost 5 years since the Hendo fight, thus Hendo isn't included. I was 100% accurate, and intentional.
The mope then misinterpreted almost 5 years as actually being 5 years, thus including Henderson. Like most of his other nonsense, he was incorrect in that assumption.
He then misquoted me as saying Okami was Anderson's best fight in 5 years. Since that wasn't what I said, I clarified. Does that make sense?
I'm not making a statement and pretending I didn't make it two days later. It's there in black and white, it's not my fault if he can't read.
Hey listen mope, the beauty of an online forum is that you can scroll back and look at exactly what was said. So in this case, I can scroll back to exactly what I said:
" I know you said almost 5 years, but lets look at who he beat in the last 5 years...
almost exactly 5 years ago
Dan Henderson - One of the most decorated fighters of all time"
I specifically phrased it that way because I had no way of knowing if you meant to include Henderson in that mix or not.
Does that make sense to you?
PS that is in the middle of page 9 if you don't believe me.