Originally Posted by The Donosaur
9 months without defending the title= interim champ is crowned
18 months without defending the title= the champ is stripped and the interim champ becomes the champ, but when the former champ returns he gets an immediate title shot
If another year passes before the former champ returns, then I don't even think they should get an immediate title shot.
This is obviously just my opinion, but I think it is more than fair.
I think this is fair for every champ.
If there out for that
long(2years+) that they need to tak another fight, it should be against a top contender, and if they're really good enough they should beat that contender and get another title shot.
God hates me, never keep my banger on safety
My mother raised me alone, you can't break me
Like my hearts pumpin the blood of Royce Gracie! 13-4-1 in sig/av