Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Luis Cruz Please don't make two threads about the EXACT same thing with an EXACT same post from you. I deleted your other one.
You must've forgot about Frank beating Tito. Guy Mezger was good and so was Ken in his time. But i always felt Frank was the better and more well rounded fighter of the two. I do agree that Tito should dominate the rematch though. But this is MMA and you never can say anything with 100% certainty, he did rock and buckle Tito in the first fight but had nothing left to finish him. He has his puncher's chance can't take that. Plus Tito gassing against Griffen still has me wondering what the heck happened. It could've been the injury that affected his training but who knows. |
I agree, I like Ken as a fighter.. as a person I have my ups and downs but as a fighter ive always loved his willingness to fight, even at the age of 43 this guy doesnt seem to turn a fight down and I like that about him, he loses, gets back up and fights another day.. but Frank is the superior of the two, Frank is a dominate athlete and fighter ill NEVER forget him laughing at Bas Rutten in Pancrase that was a great moment in fighting for me.
As for the injury, yea it very well could of been but Tito wins and says Forrest greased his legs? wtf is that about.. that shows a lack of class, and tells me that Tito knows he didnt really win that fight and IMO he didnt win.