Originally Posted by ArMnHC
I'm not biased, Tito won. It's still no use being salty about the outcome of that fight. The only thing wrong about the decision was the judge who scored it 30-27. The takedown and the fact that Tito landed more clean shots in the 3rd won him the fight. Go back and watch it again. You are more biased then anyone because you obviously don't like Tito Ortiz. If he is an "overrated, overhyped product of Dana White" like you say he is, then you are saying the same about Matt Hughes, Rich Franklin, and Chuck Liddell...all products of Dana White and all hanging from his nuts. But that's ok, there are a lot of fans like you out there and everyone is entitled to think what they want. But Forrest will never be champ, mark my words. Let him have another fight with Tito, he'll get annihalated!
Yea Griffin easily lost that fight. And, even to the dismay of all the "tuf kids", Griffin admitted that he didnt win. I still dont see why people get excited and talk about Griffin like he's the second coming of Christ. He only has a stand up game and his punches are sloppy. He's no where near to being in the same league as Tito or any of the other top fighters. And instead of giving him another challenge, we're subjected to Griffin and Bonnar 2 (and no the first fight wasnt one of the greatest fights of all time no matter how many times Rogan shills that for Spike tv. I've seen better technique and a better fight between two alley cats).