Originally Posted by LethalStriker
UFC 60 outside of the main event didn't have any big name fighters on it was definitely worth the money. Actually UFC 61 is the only UFC PPV this year that I would say wasn't worth the money.
yeah, UFC 60 was awesome. 8 fights and some of the best KOs and subs i've seen in a while. but 61 was crap. of course people are gonna be disappointed when they invest $40 to see just one fight, there's a really high chance you're gonna be disappointed. anyone that bought 61 for ken/tito II is a putz because ken sucks now and there was really only one way for that fight to go. sylvia/arlovski III was a good main event on paper and no one expected that fight to go the way it did. Neer/Burkman was a good fight, but most people don't really care about either of them and i'm surprised they didn't put that on the undercard. and don't get me started on Mir's flab-fest. 61 wasn't a bad ppv on paper, but it just didn't turn out. and most of the ppvs before that were pretty damned good.