Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TheBonger if they fought right now anywhere doesnt matter Cage,Ring, or a fucking backyard brawl, Chuck knocks Rampage the fuck out. Sorry but its true. Chuck has became a much better fighter while Rampage is obviously on the decline. By the way would Tito still fuck up Wandy? |
Pro Chuck fanatic.
It's OK man, I know Chuck is your father but relax.
Funny how you claim Rampage is on the decline when he defeated Randleman, Bustamante,Illoukhine, Liddell then lost to Silva (after pummeling Chuck for 2 rounds). This is where you claim his career has "declined" he defeated Minowa, then Arona (#2 ranked LHW in the world, don't kid yourself), then another loss the Silva (#1 ranked LHW in the world, not opinion actual fact), then defeated Ninja, then lost to Shougun (top ranked LHW, would dominate UFC and make Chcuk his bag boy), then defeats Yokoi, then defeated Dong Sik Yoon (UNANIMOUS decision but your defense will be he's an 0-3 fighter and he mounted Rampage, so that nullifies Rampages win right?) and most recently Lindland (Lindland is a great wrestler, he made the fight boring as everyone expected and Rampage still pulled out the decision, unanimous IMO as rd. 3 was clearly Rampage, the gilluotine did not finish the fight, no pointes shouls be awarded for a choke that fails).
So somewhere in ther his career declined as after he beat Chuck senseless for 2 rounds he lost to the best LHW in the world, then he lost again to the best LHW in the world, then defeated the #2 LHW in the world, then lost to a top 5 LHW in the world so how exactly is that a decline?
Please elaborate.