View Single Post
Old 08-13-2006, 12:19 PM   #14 (permalink)
dagreat1
Reputation: ∞
 
dagreat1's Avatar
 
Status: You Must Die
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,188

dagreat1 will have their jersey retired.dagreat1 will have their jersey retired.dagreat1 will have their jersey retired.dagreat1 will have their jersey retired.dagreat1 will have their jersey retired.dagreat1 will have their jersey retired.dagreat1 will have their jersey retired.dagreat1 will have their jersey retired.dagreat1 will have their jersey retired.dagreat1 will have their jersey retired.dagreat1 will have their jersey retired.



Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tystick357
Well you said that Pro Chuck people would use the fact that the fight was in 2002 as an excuse that he would do better now, which is a good excuse.

In no way did Tito "fuck up Wandy" but he did beat him. Then you talked about the sport evolving, meaning fighters evolve and get better, so I just saw you using that defense for Wanderlei and not seeing it being used for Chuck.

It's no big deal, maybe I'm perceiving your posts wrong.

Yes Chuck is better now but the excuse is ridiculous, how is it that Chuck would be better now than he was in 03 and yet rampage is the same fighter or as TheBonger says, is on a "decline"?

That was the point I was trying to get at, most Chuck fans make that excuse constantly and it is not validated for reasons I already stated regarding Rampage and his supposed "decline".

Last edited by dagreat1; 08-13-2006 at 12:22 PM.
dagreat1 is offline   Reply With Quote