The problem is that we don't what earns higher scores in the judges minds and that varries from judge to judge as the scores are so different at times.
I don't know what is worth more head kick that lands but does not knock down the opponent or a double leg takedown (no slam).
Or a huge punch that rocks the other fighter or an elbow that opens a cut (obviouly the gash hurts but does it do more damage than swelling up an eye).
Or a stiff jap vs a hard low kick.
Is there a set system (guidelines) the judges are to follow?
If so, could someone please post them, that would crtainly give us a better idea of what these judges are supposed to be loking for.