Thread: why are the losers getting to fight on pay per view
View Single Post
Old 09-02-2006, 03:29 PM   #5 (permalink)
Boo
Reputation: ∞
 
Boo's Avatar
 
Status: Old-timer
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Iowa
Posts: 2,100

Boo will have their jersey retired.Boo will have their jersey retired.Boo will have their jersey retired.Boo will have their jersey retired.Boo will have their jersey retired.Boo will have their jersey retired.Boo will have their jersey retired.Boo will have their jersey retired.Boo will have their jersey retired.Boo will have their jersey retired.Boo will have their jersey retired.
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by NinjaShogunRua
Nick Diaz took the fight on short notice. He was replacing Thiago Alves who had to pull out of the fight due to injury. I don't really think Diaz is a loser. Yes, he lost 3 fights in a row, but they were all to solid fighters and were close fights. He's a young guy, and has alot of potential.

I don't agree with you calling Josh Neer a loser either, he's 17-5 and trains with some of the best fighters in the world(MFS). He's also young, and still has alot of fights left in him.
I'll second that.
Boo is offline   Reply With Quote