Originally Posted by bigc
i dont know about you but i am gettin tired of losers fighting on pay per view example ufc 62 wes combs got his ass kicked at ultimate fight night gets a chance to fight at ufc 62 gets his ass kicked again and nick diaz 3 losses in a row gets a chance to fight at ufc 62 he beat a loser josh neer and at ufc 63 danny abbadi is fighting
theres so many more but im to tired to type them what do you think about it
I agree. Most people on here are just used to sub par fighters because unfortuatly the UFC's fighters suck. Sure a dude may be an exciting fighter, sure he may have some skills(or he wouldnt be in there). but the fact is 3 losses in a row means you suck and should not be on pay per view. I'll watch on ulltimate fight night but Pay per view is supposed to be the best of the best.
Honestly, for a fighter to be considered one of the best he has to be dominant and not lose, always find a way to win, most of the time. for example, Wandy rarely loses, it was years before he resently lost to a much bigger fighter. Chuck as much as I dont like him, he has proven himself. Fedor, the prime example of a winner, even matt hughes(whom I hate) rarely loses. But Nick diaz?? Come on people, don't you respect your self a little bit more than to subject yourself to losers? the proof is in the record, I dont care how close the fight is, a loss is a loss and he sucks