Originally Posted by harlemhustla145
I agree. Most people on here are just used to sub par fighters because unfortuatly the UFC's fighters suck. Sure a dude may be an exciting fighter, sure he may have some skills(or he wouldnt be in there). but the fact is 3 losses in a row means you suck and should not be on pay per view. I'll watch on ulltimate fight night but Pay per view is supposed to be the best of the best.
Honestly, for a fighter to be considered one of the best he has to be dominant and not lose, always find a way to win, most of the time. for example, Wandy rarely loses, it was years before he resently lost to a much bigger fighter. Chuck as much as I dont like him, he has proven himself. Fedor, the prime example of a winner, even matt hughes(whom I hate) rarely loses. But Nick diaz?? Come on people, don't you respect your self a little bit more than to subject yourself to losers? the proof is in the record, I dont care how close the fight is, a loss is a loss and he sucks
he was gone from the UFC after three losses, but they were not horrible losses where he got knockout of subbed...they were all decisions....he then wins his next fightsomewhere else...so now a fighter goes down and the ask one guy to step in(jake shields)..he declines so they ask maybe the only guy left (nick diaz)...The UFC probably seen that this guy had great potential and knew that he could do much better than his three losses...so they bring in him in on five days nmotice and the guy wins the fight...how do you NOT have respect for the guy after that fight
-What you see is what you get with Dana," Diamond said. "He's funny, tough, witty, powerful, respectful of the sport. And he eats, sleeps and breaths the UFC. If you cut his arm, I think little octagons would fall out."-