Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dork8503 harlem i usually agree with a lot you have to say but saying Shane can't beat Floyd because he lost to Forrest makes me wonder about you.
I mean why not just say he can't because Floyd because he lost to Winky.
I mean Hopkins lost to Taylor but he beat Winky and Tarver. |
You misunderstood my math. Forrest beat SSM because of defense. He counter punched, grabbed, and dodged his way to a technically masterful victory. Floyd Mayweather is worse!!! He's extremely fast and a defensive first fighter that counterpunches the hell out of people. That's how you beat Shane Mosley. PBF's defense is much better than Winkys.' He's uses a philly Shell which is the same defense James Toney and B Hop uses but he's much better at it.
Shane Mosley is a offensive first fighter that has great defense but leaves himself open. That's how Cotto, Winky, and Forrest were able to hit him. SSM is good enough to not get hit with a KO shot but Forrest nearly knocked him out if you remember.
PBF doesn't get hit!
Quote:
|
Shane has the style speed and power to beat PBF. I am not saying its a lock but i would bet for Shane. Same goes for Cotto.
|
They could beat him, but they have to hit him first. Floyd can't be hit!
Quote:
|
And yes if Shane or Cotto beats Floyd it does mean something, they beat the p4p king, which imo makes them better then he is.
|
If Shane does than I agree, but Cotto is naturally bigger and stronger. P4P means that if every fighter was the same size naturally, who is the better.
Quote:
|
Forrest lost to Mayorga and Shane would school Mayorga but Shane lost to Forrest. Soooooo why is that.
|
Forrest had a severe shoulder injury for both those fights. He eventually got surgury and now he's 100%