Thread: Nl Mvp?
View Single Post
Old 09-26-2008, 07:21 PM   #6 (permalink)
bigsmooth696969
Reputation: 750+
 
bigsmooth696969's Avatar
 
Status: Die BJ Nuthuggeries!
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 789

bigsmooth696969 has the Midas touch.bigsmooth696969 has the Midas touch.bigsmooth696969 has the Midas touch.bigsmooth696969 has the Midas touch.bigsmooth696969 has the Midas touch.bigsmooth696969 has the Midas touch.bigsmooth696969 has the Midas touch.

Send a message via AIM to bigsmooth696969


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mac View Post
Hanley Ramirez isn't even the most valuable player on his team, that is Cantu. Howard shitting under .250 and has an ungodly amount of strikeouts. Manny has only been in the NL for around 2 months.

Pujols is by far the NL MVP. He doesn't strike out, pitchers are scared of him and he had what should have been a sub .500 ball club in the race for most of the year. Besides the fact that he is a gold glove defender. The only other person that should be considered that knows what a glove is for id David Wright.
How do you figure Cantu is more valuable than Ramirez b/c Hanley has more Runs, HR's, SB's, and a 20 point higher AVG and 1 less error. Whats your logic on this?
bigsmooth696969 is offline   Reply With Quote