Thread: Nl Mvp?
View Single Post
Old 09-28-2008, 04:15 PM   #11 (permalink)
bigsmooth696969
Reputation: 750+
 
bigsmooth696969's Avatar
 
Status: Die BJ Nuthuggeries!
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 789

bigsmooth696969 has the Midas touch.bigsmooth696969 has the Midas touch.bigsmooth696969 has the Midas touch.bigsmooth696969 has the Midas touch.bigsmooth696969 has the Midas touch.bigsmooth696969 has the Midas touch.bigsmooth696969 has the Midas touch.

Send a message via AIM to bigsmooth696969


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mac View Post
As far as the Hanley/Cantu thing I honestly can't remember where i saw it, I have a lot of down time at work so I'm constantly on the net. It may have been on Yahoo, but I can't be sure, I will try to find it.

As far as Delgado/Wright, I wasn't calling you out on that, I was calling out the person who made the poll.

@NebraskaMMAfan-No way Ludwick is more valuable than Pujols, that's why you can't just pick based on stats. Ludwick had a tremendous year, don't get me wrong, but he was very streaky and up and down. He would get hot then go into a slump. Pujols was consitent all the way through, plus Pujols is the big reason Ludwick did so well. When Ludwick batted 2nd he would get a steady diet of fast balls because Pujols was coming up next, when he batted 4th, they would pitch around Pujols and forced to pitch to Ludwick.

Pujols made a very mediocre team play over .500 ball. Pujols is the only guy that was in the NL for the whole season that opposing managers worry about every time he's at the plate.

Don't worry about it Mac. I hear NFL shit all the time working with the Bengals and 95% of it I never hear get reported.
bigsmooth696969 is offline   Reply With Quote