No offense meant for the people that run this site, or take care of it and these forums. I just don't see much of a difference between Kid Nate's articles and say, mmanews' staff writer John Specht's blogs. Examples here: MMA News - John Specht's blog - *Sonnen-The Great OZ* MMA News - John Specht's blog - *Iceman To StrikeForce?* MMA News - John Specht's blog - *Kos Due For Beatdown* MMA News - John Specht's blog - *Florian To Slap Maynard*
Both are just opinions that show bias towards certain fighters, and are not worth any more than that. Certainly neither show too much respectable journalism. It's all about "shock" and "entertainment", rather than being informative.
I'm just curious why one opinion would be excepted over another. Not that I'll go against this rule (even if I could post anywhere but the noobjack forum), I'm just curious.