Originally Posted by rivethead
I think it's funny that when the "brock-has-the-bestest-wrestling-skillses-cause-he-was-DI-champ-n-stuff" debate was still debateable, I brought up Ron Waterman before the Carwin fight. Waterman is one of the only fighters to have trained both, and he flat out said that lesnar isn't a better wrestler than Carwin. The DI-is-automatically-betterz-than-DIII crowd instantly howled with laughter because Waterman had trained Carwin more recently, and thus could not be seen as an unbiased source...but Munoz is supposed to be unbiased here, despite his current relationship with Anderson.
brock would probably major carwin in an actual match but in mma its alot different because of strikes. amatuer wrestling and mma wrestling are two different things entirely.
D1 is better then D3 and is lightyears ahead of D2 but thats not to say that a D3 guy cant be better then a D1 guy and his skills and striking ability can make him a better more effective wrestler in mma