View Single Post
Old 07-17-2012, 10:48 AM   #10 (permalink)
noahm
Reputation: ∞
 
noahm's Avatar
 
Status: Here
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 990

noahm will have their jersey retired.noahm will have their jersey retired.noahm will have their jersey retired.noahm will have their jersey retired.noahm will have their jersey retired.noahm will have their jersey retired.noahm will have their jersey retired.noahm will have their jersey retired.noahm will have their jersey retired.noahm will have their jersey retired.noahm will have their jersey retired.



Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by the_dark_angel_4ever View Post
Can't say I entirely agree, but it's a step in the right direction.

The term "effective aggression" bothers me though, especially when it comes to grappling. If a fighter is on his back, in guard, and attacking with submissions but isn't actually able to secure one and finish the fight, is that still considered EFFECTIVE?
^^ Yes, it is interesting how a strike that connects, yet fails to KO an opponent is still given quite a bit of consideration, but a submission that fails, even if it was sunk pretty good isn't typically given much weight other than time spent with octagon control.
noahm is offline   Reply With Quote