Originally Posted by SWIFTboy
we're not really looking to change our views on 'ranking theory', so to speak. We've already established it's a mix of subjective and objective and have five members that weigh these to varying degrees while taking certain established criteria into consideration. Arguing the theory behind it is just beating a dead horse.
I'm fully aware. I was on the rankings committee before I was kicked off and kicked out of the batcave.