I definitely wouldnt have Brock in the HOF... the UFC HOF is a joke, Dana's personal list...
But comparing Brock to Colman is very poor argument imo...
2 wrongs dont make a right... just because the UFC put Mark in there for some reason, doesnt mean they have to do the same with Brock... or hold that same precedent... because if they did, it would become packed and watered down quickly.
Originally Posted by beardown98
So your point that Lesnars fans stuck with MMA is crap and holds no water.
When did I ever say that... And the only way to prove if Fans stuck with the sport is to see if the PPV numbers he pulled were repeated without him?... right...
A lot of those were mindless Lesnar fans... but who knows how many stayed with the sport... hell even a few here and on other forums admit to coming to MMA because of Brock, and have become big fans ever since.
Originally Posted by Mac
Bottom line is Lesnar doesn't have enough time in the game to even be considered, 7 fights can't get you into the hall of fame, no way, no how. Not a legit hall of fame anyhow. I can't believe I'm even chiming in on this, it's so ridiculous. PPV buys as a consideration for HOF? Fucking stupid.
But compared to Coleman... Dont know how he got brought up in the first place...
Mark went 7-5 in the UFC.... If your basing Coleman's HOF bid on his HW title, than it isnt far fetched to put Brock in there as well.
Neither really deserve to be in a legit HOF imo... if you look at how they are set up in other respected sports.