MMA News Forums - View Single Post - Dana White: Hill vs. Secor judges should lose their job

Kemo · 11-13-2012, 03:09 PM

As I understand the rules, being an exhibition and in theory a two-round fight, the third round is "sudden victory," meaning the first two were split one each. So whoever wins the third round is the winner. The first two rounds , you might as well pretend didn't happen.

So if Hill got the only takedown in the third round, he got a checkmark or tick or "X" or whatever in the takedown box on the judges' scorecards and Secor didn't. That's the only way I can make sense of it.

11-13-2012, 03:09 PM	#10 (permalink)
Kemo Reputation: 500+ Status: Teh Kemo Join Date: May 2006 Location: Louisville, Ky Posts: 226	As I understand the rules, being an exhibition and in theory a two-round fight, the third round is "sudden victory," meaning the first two were split one each. So whoever wins the third round is the winner. The first two rounds , you might as well pretend didn't happen. So if Hill got the only takedown in the third round, he got a checkmark or tick or "X" or whatever in the takedown box on the judges' scorecards and Secor didn't. That's the only way I can make sense of it. __________________ Click HERE to take the Polack test. Look, my sig says "fuck" in it.