PDA

View Full Version : MMA News Forums and... Nudity?



King Fisher
07-17-2007, 08:57 PM
I am fairly new to MMA forums, and I love it.

But I have been asked to change my Sig already because of nudity. My Sig was the same as it is now, just without the little black square.

Now that Sig got me alot of rep, and people seemed to like it. It wasnt hardcore, it had reference to UFC, and Paris Hilton's nipple all at once! Needless to say plenty of people enjoyed it. It was more of a comedic statement than anything.

Now I have to believe that at least 90% of the people on MMA Forums are at least 18, and probably enjoy seeing a nipple. So my question is, does MMA News Forums need to be so strict against soft-core nudity such as my sig?

P.S. I hope I dont get in trouble for this post, just a question.

:confusedsmilie:

valheruking
07-17-2007, 08:59 PM
:bant:

Bullock
07-17-2007, 09:00 PM
Unfortunately, people can get fired from their jobs for looking at nudity on the company computers. People like me.

Anything w/ nudity must have a label on it warning people not to enter the thread.

In the case of your sig, people have to see it regardless whether they know it's there or not. Even if they don't look at your post directly, any pic that is on the page will show up in the "cache."

Matt Boone
07-17-2007, 09:00 PM
Advertisers, bla bla. Plus just common sense lol - no naked titties in your sig.

Bullock
07-17-2007, 09:02 PM
^^^LoL


I was the guy who made him change it btw, so neg rep away pervs.

neonatural45
07-17-2007, 09:03 PM
no, maybe in the off topic if it has a warning

Bullock
07-17-2007, 09:04 PM
I wonder who the 1 vote is?

matto
07-17-2007, 09:07 PM
Unfortunately, people can get fired from their jobs for looking at nudity on the company computers. People like me.

Anything w/ nudity must have a label on it warning people not to enter the thread.

In the case of your sig, people have to see it regardless whether they know it's there or not. Even if they don't look at your post directly, any pic that is on the page will show up in the "cache."

i was pissed off about this at first, but what you said makes sence.

Chute
07-17-2007, 09:08 PM
Unfortunately, people can get fired from their jobs for looking at nudity on the company computers. People like me.

Anything w/ nudity must have a label on it warning people not to enter the thread.

In the case of your sig, people have to see it regardless whether they know it's there or not. Even if they don't look at your post directly, any pic that is on the page will show up in the "cache."


Exactly, I know if Bullock is anything like myself where tits and ass is the shit no question I love seeing naked chicks, but when Im at work and I see tits come on the screen and my manager is behind me I either

A) Get fired
B) they will ban the site.

I dont want either to happen because I need money and I love talking on this site and I dont wanna lose either. So I would agree that there should be a warning in the thread title if there is nudity

King Fisher
07-17-2007, 09:10 PM
Unfortunately, people can get fired from their jobs for looking at nudity on the company computers. People like me.

Anything w/ nudity must have a label on it warning people not to enter the thread.

In the case of your sig, people have to see it regardless whether they know it's there or not. Even if they don't look at your post directly, any pic that is on the page will show up in the "cache."


Understood. But I have been on other forums that allow it. Is this just a "looking out for your users" clause to keep people on the forums?

neonatural45
07-17-2007, 09:11 PM
Damn this poll

I voted no but I meant that there shouldnt be nudity

Bullock
07-17-2007, 09:15 PM
The poll is very misleading.

I am all for light nudity.

It just has to have a warning on the thread title.



I don't know any credible MMA forums that allow nudity in sigs or avs.
Ninjashoes allows it, but they also love the assdick revolution and trannies and such so go be w/ them if you want to post nakedness in your sig/av lol.

King Fisher
07-17-2007, 09:15 PM
Damn this poll

I voted no but I meant that there shouldnt be nudity

then you voted correctly

King Fisher
07-17-2007, 09:16 PM
The poll is very misleading.

I am all for light nudity.

It just has to have a warning on the thread title.


Ok, so then nudity in the sig.... no good

nudity in a thread with a warning in the title... beautiful?

:grinsmile26:

valheruking
07-17-2007, 09:19 PM
lol "Gaping asshole inside"

*everyone enters*

WadoKai
07-17-2007, 09:19 PM
I voted yes because I'm a dirty old man.

Bullock
07-17-2007, 09:20 PM
Ok, so then nudity in the sig.... no good

nudity in a thread with a warning in the title... beautiful?

:grinsmile26:


Correct.

If you look in the off topic section you will actually see a thread that has the original pic in your sig that I made after I told you to take it off or blur it out.


What about gaping assholes are those OK is labeled properly?

You're the only gaping asshole that I want to see around here, Sundance. :wavesmile:

Bran
07-17-2007, 09:23 PM
if you want to post a naked pic, just put a trigg face over the nudity.

twankydawg
07-17-2007, 09:25 PM
Exactly, I know if Bullock is anything like myself where tits and ass is the shit no question I love seeing naked chicks, but when Im at work and I see tits come on the screen and my manager is behind me I either

A) Get fired
B) they will ban the site.

I dont want either to happen because I need money and I love talking on this site and I dont wanna lose either. So I would agree that there should be a warning in the thread title if there is nudity

I'm sorry guys, I voted for. If my manager is behind me, he asks me to send him the link. As long as I don't let any viruses loose on the network i'm good. I enjoy some TNA at work more than at home. I forgot how it was in corp america, I've been there and they will fire your ass quick!

Bullock
07-17-2007, 09:29 PM
if you want to post a naked pic, just put a trigg face over the nudity.


exactly.


JOIN THE TRIGG RESISTANCE

Mirko
07-17-2007, 09:30 PM
It was hard but I voted against nipple :sadsmile1:

Bullock
07-17-2007, 09:43 PM
Like I said, the threadstarter was wondering why he cant have nudity in his sig; not whether or not nudity is allowed on the forums in general.

Malice
07-17-2007, 09:50 PM
Shit I work from home, but I have a wife and she is pretty much like a boss, except she will put me on suspension without ass if she sees it.

So do it for my marriage please lol...

I vote MMA only unless it is tucked in a forum somewhere...so I can see it when she leaves!

2mcgrath
07-17-2007, 09:57 PM
im a guy so yes i love to see some nipple lol

BDunn
07-17-2007, 10:29 PM
Unfortunately, people can get fired from their jobs for looking at nudity on the company computers. People like me.

Anything w/ nudity must have a label on it warning people not to enter the thread.

In the case of your sig, people have to see it regardless whether they know it's there or not. Even if they don't look at your post directly, any pic that is on the page will show up in the "cache."
I voted yes then I read this makes sense now

spinach
07-17-2007, 10:38 PM
How about .... this isn't your forum .... and when an admin tells you to change it .... just do it.

Matt Boone
07-17-2007, 11:05 PM
I wonder who the 1 vote is?

That was me lol. It was 1 yes, 1 no before I came back here just now. I was the 1 yes. I don't see any problems with nudity on here PERSONALLY, but things are the way they are lol. We do allow it in the over 18 place or whatever we decided back when, but in your sig? Ehhhh lol

Gmunit
07-17-2007, 11:48 PM
my place of employment doesn't give a rat's fuck what I look @

but since it hinders (sp?) other posters I say "No-Go"

King Fisher
07-18-2007, 08:10 AM
haha, the poll definately doesnt represent this thread properly. People are voting at the begining based on the fact that they like nudity. Then when they read the logic, their minds probably change

Bullock
07-18-2007, 09:16 PM
it's okay.

I make confusing polls all the time.


And our polls aren't nearly as misleading as some of the polls done here in the States, lol.

mxskatap
07-19-2007, 04:08 PM
I see nothing wrong with "playboy" type nudity on this site, but "Anal mom's gone wild" shouldnt be on here, there are plenty of sites for that...

strife
07-20-2007, 06:06 PM
^^^LoL


I was the guy who made him change it btw, so neg rep away pervs.

Don't neg Bullock, he'll neg you 10 times and abuse his power...period.

I know form experience.

Bullock
07-21-2007, 03:13 AM
Don't neg Bullock, he'll neg you 10 times and abuse his power...period.

I know form experience.

LOL Are you still on this?


Bullock because he abuses his power.

Other than him...Diegonightmare



Here is what happened:

You neg repd me.


I go to neg rep you back, and I accidentally give you good rep.

So in order to negate the good rep I gave you and also leave a neg rep on your acct, I had to give you two neg reps.

If you think that is abusing my power, I don't give a fuck.

Any time I have been wrong when using my admin powers, I have openly admitted that I was wrong.



Keep bitching about it though. I will just repost this every time so people can see what a jack ass you are acting like.

Dork8503
07-21-2007, 03:22 AM
This shit is funny

I neg reped someone on 17 of their posts an they only had 18 lol. He was the let me tell you something brother guy.

I also pos rep people a bunch.

Ramma
07-21-2007, 10:35 AM
This shit is funny

I neg reped someone on 17 of their posts an they only had 18 lol. He was the let me tell you something brother guy.

I also pos rep people a bunch.

That's just wrong.....brother!

but I mean....

WHATCHA GONNA DO!?

I remember that guy.. he was crazy lol

valheruking
07-21-2007, 06:58 PM
I liked him.

wonderbee
07-23-2007, 07:22 PM
I do not think there needs to be nudity on this site considering that there is plenty of sites on the inter web where you can see as much nudity as you want. However we need to stop being so ridicules and restrictive about naked people being that it is one thing we all share, that being that we are all just naked people deep down.

( Naked for Jesus)

Nate_Deezy
07-24-2007, 03:08 AM
I do not think there needs to be nudity on this site considering that there is plenty of sites on the inter web where you can see as much nudity as you want. However we need to stop being so ridicules and restrictive about naked people being that it is one thing we all share, that being that we are all just naked people deep down.

( Naked for Jesus)

:lmfao: :lmfao: :lmfao:

WTF?

jwking
07-30-2007, 03:23 PM
yes some people are at work.. Like me, and don't want to lose my job cause you like to post porn..

Ramma
07-30-2007, 04:54 PM
I do not think there needs to be nudity on this site considering that there is plenty of sites on the inter web where you can see as much nudity as you want. However we need to stop being so ridicules and restrictive about naked people being that it is one thing we all share, that being that we are all just naked people deep down.

( Naked for Jesus)

Naked for Jesus? lol..

Thaistylist
07-30-2007, 05:11 PM
I do not think there needs to be nudity on this site considering that there is plenty of sites on the inter web where you can see as much nudity as you want. However we need to stop being so ridicules and restrictive about naked people being that it is one thing we all share, that being that we are all just naked people deep down.

( Naked for Jesus)


One of the most mind boggling posts I have ever read