MMA News Forums

MMA News Forums (http://www.mmanews.com/forums/)
-   General MMA Forum (http://www.mmanews.com/forums/general-mma-forum/)
-   -   R We Paying For Trash ? (http://www.mmanews.com/forums/general-mma-forum/1320-r-we-paying-trash.html)

SASK_MMA 08-05-2006 09:27 PM

R We Paying For Trash ?
 
Some UFC pay per veiw events have been just plain shi**y. I havent ordered one in so long. Its sucks cause i wanna but the cards are way to shitty!!! I mean i have seen so many threads about these cards. Is the UFC trying to sell garbage for 40 a payperveiw ? whatever im just stickin to the underground untill the UFC can put some bettercards together:fingersmilie:

supermark21 08-05-2006 09:32 PM

theyre pretty sad because theyre banking on that one good fight they have per card and trying to get exposure on all of the lesser known fighters i think. im just as upset as you are. im not ordering the next one unless they improve it alot. i just cant keep on wasting my money cause construction doesnt pay enough

matto 08-05-2006 09:49 PM

some of the cards were boring, like ufc 60, but all the ufc 50's were pritty good, ufc 62 doesnt seem that exceiting, cause sorbal is going to lose, and bonner vs. griffin isnt that exciting, but im still going to buy it. ufc 63 is going to be a must buy with hughes vs. gsp. that fight alone is worth 100$

SASK_MMA 08-05-2006 10:04 PM

I dont think it's worth 100$....it's a fight im looking forward to but not worth 100$...if the rest ofthe card isnt good i will not buy!!!!....If Liddel fights Wanderlei then i'll pay for sure..lol

ArMnHC 08-05-2006 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by matto
some of the cards were boring, like ufc 60, but all the ufc 50's were pritty good, ufc 62 doesnt seem that exceiting, cause sorbal is going to lose, and bonner vs. griffin isnt that exciting, but im still going to buy it. ufc 63 is going to be a must buy with hughes vs. gsp. that fight alone is worth 100$

not all the 50's were good...like 55 for example LOL. And 60 looked boring because it didn't have a title fight on the card, but it turned out to be AWESOME! some fights may look bad/boring on paper, but can turn out to be exciting! Fisher vs. Wiman was an excellent example. If Wiman doesn't get another shot in the UFC, there is definitely something wrong...

SASK_MMA 08-05-2006 10:20 PM

i dont care about the under card..i care aboutt he ones they show, if they are not good then it's not worth it

Tystick357 08-05-2006 10:45 PM

Well if possible just get a bunch of friends to split the price and it's nothing.

But there are some people whose friends don't like MMA or have no friends, so I guess I understand why they won't buy sometimes.

ArMnHC 08-05-2006 10:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SASK_MMA
i dont care about the under card..i care aboutt he ones they show, if they are not good then it's not worth it

maybe you should care about the undercard, cuz if all the main card fights suck, that's all you have to fall back on. Had they shown some of the undercard fights of UFC 61, people may have enjoyed the show.

SASK_MMA 08-05-2006 11:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tystick357
Well if possible just get a bunch of friends to split the price and it's nothing.

But there are some people whose friends don't like MMA or have no friends, so I guess I understand why they won't buy sometimes.

Like i said it's not about money it's about the main events, i know the ufc is making lots of money so i think it's about time to start dishing it out on the main card!!!!!!!!!!

Legend 08-05-2006 11:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tystick357
Well if possible just get a bunch of friends to split the price and it's nothing.

But there are some people whose friends don't like MMA or have no friends, so I guess I understand why they won't buy sometimes.

Yeah thats what i do. If my bubby didnt owe me a free PPV then i would really have to consider wether or not to order UFC 62.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:12 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.