MMA News Forums » MMA Forums » General MMA Forum

[Kass101]

ok but answer my question. why dont you have filho in your rankings?

oh and read the thread i never even responded to your rankings until after you said that so there ya go.

[killerinstinct]

i don't know i guess i just kinda forgot it was kinda late when i made my last rankings and they were fairly difficult to make.

[LA Suxs]

and Kawajiri the guy who's the champion and beat Hansen, wo you do have there

[killerinstinct]

Originally Posted by LA Suxs

Yup basically you have Mirko over the UFC champ and former UFC champ, and Hunt who beat Mirko. Just word on Sherk going down doesnt make it official since he never fought there before. Kid Yamamamoto so low, and you're missing so many people at LW. Just admit it you get your knowledge from TUF and whatever commentary Bonnar and Griffin bring

mmaweekly recently updated their rankings page and they have crocop at 3 as well.

[Kass101]

crocop cant be three. he can be top 10 IMO but he has 2 losses in last 4 fight and only 1 real win against barnett. he just lost to hunt so hunt has to be ranked ahead of him at this point.

[Afro]

Wow rankings can get real confusing.

[killerinstinct]

Originally Posted by Afro Samurai

Wow rankings can get real confusing.

i think that's something we can all agree on.

[Afro]

I think that only thing that hasnt changed from list to list is

Chuck at #1, Fedor at #1, Hughes at #1, and Sudo at #8.

[killerinstinct]

Originally Posted by Afro Samurai

I think that only thing that hasnt changed from list to list is

Chuck at #1, Fedor at #1, Hughes at #1, and Sudo at #8.

WW top 3 for everyone is pretty much the same-hughes,gsp,penn.

[Matt Boone]

I don't know a lot of places refuse to put Hughes on top just because Penn beat him. Some organizations refuse to put GSP up there because Hughes beat him and Penn gave him a tough fight. People have their own ideas when it comes to rankings, but there is SOMEWHAT of a universal list of rules when coming up with lists. Whenever me and Cruz can come together on a time schedule and we bang out these lists, you'll see probably the best lists anyone has simply because of the complications that arise almost everyone agrees on the point system, the tally system, etc. And it just doesn't work that way, way too many varrying opinions and varrying ideas on how to rank top 10 lists. When you combine them all the finish result is usually pretty whacky and doesn't look right. Ours will be debatable, some probably in controversial fashion, but they won't be a complete mess like 90% of the other top 10 lists you'll find out there.