MMA News Forums » MMA Forums » General MMA Forum

[IlDuceMacmanus]

I think it is just the UFC trying to keep a comprehensive list of their current fighters, but I know that Phil Baroni was still listed on their website long after his release. This could be partially because of other competition, but I think it is mainly because they want to keep an updated list of their current fighters.

[Ifightforaliving]

like previously stated I think it is just a list of active fighters on their roster maybe a few guys that slipped through the cracks it does take them forever to update their site sometimes

[perc10]

I think it was like a year and a half ago when I first checked out the UFC and Pride sites UFC has alwways kept a list of fighters who are currently fighting for them,Pride used to list every fighter who ever fought there,UFC did not. WWE does the same thing,they list people who are under contract,UFC is a brand not a BFF(Best Friends Forever).

[Monsterman]

A few years back they used to have everyone else but Frank Shamrock. =) I don´t care since i haven´t really used their page other than the vids but it would show some class to at least have all the champs. You know, to pretend it isn´t only about the money.

[perc10]

But it is all about the money, just like football,boxing,baseball,basketball check out a team website and see if guys who left are still on it. I agree the website should have a history section with PPV results and champs (this one does a good job) What they have now is a roster,Abadi is kinda fucked up though,wonder if he just sits by his phone and keeps refreshing the web page

[ozzy2525]

Why would you keep fighters that are no longer in your org? This thread is so dumb, and has a lot of UFC hate on it.

[perc10]

Agreed