MMA News Forums » MMA Forums » General MMA Forum

[ILJO]

Nazis








just kidding........ kinda. I thought this was America? Does the admin/mod team live in China? just kidding again. dont ban me

[slikguy]

i hate censorship

[BigBanda]

Fine with me and does this only apply to current candidates?? So we can put up any other political figureS? lol

[Clint]

Originally Posted by BigBanda

Fine with me and does this only apply to current candidates?? So we can put up any other political figureS? lol

lol we'll have to handle those ones on the fly.

[blah]

Originally Posted by Clint

Due to the problems we have had recently. We have decided to ban all negative political signatures and avatars.

You can still have a sig or avatar that supports a candidate but you cannot have one that is against a candidate.

Hopefully this will be enough to stop the arguments as we get closer to the election.

As of 6pm tomorrow, we will begin removing any avatars that are against the rules without notification, so please change them before then.

This isn't to punish anyone, but to make the forum a better place for people who want to discuss MMA.


Thanks
-The Forum Moderators/Administrators

This is absolutely ridiculous, a huge attempt to limit freedom of speech. You won't allow intelligently designed avatars/sigs with political points to them--not terribly upsetting or offensive avatars/sigs either--but you have no problem with some of the avatars/sigs that objectify women? I think this is an instance where you and/or some of the other moderators just personally like Obama and therefore want to squash any opposition to him, given that these sig/avs are against him.

[MasterShake]

Maybe we should just ban politics from the forum, since this is a MMA forum, if you want politics go to CNN.com - Breaking News, U.S., World, Weather, Entertainment & Video News for christ sake. Lets quit this petty shit and talk MMA.

[BigBanda]

Originally Posted by blah

This is absolutely ridiculous, a huge attempt to limit freedom of speech. You won't allow intelligently designed avatars/sigs with political points to them--not terribly upsetting or offensive avatars/sigs either--but you have no problem with some of the avatars/sigs that objectify women? I think this is an instance where you and/or some of the other moderators just personally like Obama and therefore want to squash any opposition to him, given that these sig/avs are against him.

I think you can say what you want about political figures but keep it in the politics forum but just not letting offensive sigs and avatars anymore because of the drama it caused yesterday.

I'll prove you can say what you want...

Screw Obama!

lol

[Clint]

Originally Posted by blah

This is absolutely ridiculous, a huge attempt to limit freedom of speech. You won't allow intelligently designed avatars/sigs with political points to them--not terribly upsetting or offensive avatars/sigs either--but you have no problem with some of the avatars/sigs that objectify women? I think this is an instance where you and/or some of the other moderators just personally like Obama and therefore want to squash any opposition to him, given that these sig/avs are against him.

A) You must be forgetting the avatar calling Mccain a douchebag that started alot of this trouble?

B) This is a private website, free speech is inherently limited and doesn't even apply here since you are still free to say whatever you want, just not here (Edit: For the love of Fuck's Sake how many times do we have to reiterate this point?)

c) The "Objectification of Women" has not started any fights that led to members being banned.

[2mcgrath]

i see no problem with this,i see it as a solution to help cut down on some of the bullshit around here lately.

good idea to do this clint if you ask me.

[rivethead]

Originally Posted by blah

This is absolutely ridiculous, a huge attempt to limit freedom of speech...

I thought it was an attempt to limit freedom of whining.


If it was my forum and a particular practice made more work for me and my staff, and distracted from the purpose of the forum, it would be gone.

But then again, I think Freedom of Speech is a myth and the Statue of Liberty belongs in the Smithsonian, so what do I know?