MMA News Forums » MMA Forums » General MMA Forum

[Noob]

Jim Brown was awful. He worked with another guy too, squeaky voice. Kinda dorky. I couldn't stand him. As for Quadros, he's kind of just run-of-the-mill. A bit annoying at times. Goldberg is better in my opinion, but not by much.

[killerinstinct]

Originally Posted by Intellectual

too be honest, i dont like Joe Rogan commentating...maybe thats just me.

joe rogan is a great commentator.he's very knowledgable and humorous too.he breaks down a fight and explains what the fighters are trying to do. while randy is a great commentator joe will definately be missed.

[killerinstinct]

Originally Posted by kickass32

Rogan rocks!!!! By far the best colour guy in the sport...IMO

Sure beats the hell out of that kung fu guy they had for a couple in the early days, and that wrestler guy, what's his name....Mike Blatnick????? something like that...he was horrible!!!!!:banghead:

The last PPV when Couture was added, I agree it was a near perfect mix..

I also thought Frank Mir did a great job, the one he filled in for Rogan a while back.

i liked steffan bonnars commentating i think he did a great job at UFC 59.

[Afro]

I dont think that Rogan is the best, but I dont mind him

cant stand Goldberg, JMO.. he speaks well but I just think hes too corny.

[Rhino_Man]

Originally Posted by killerinstinct

i liked steffan bonnars commentating i think he did a great job at UFC 59.

The only thing I remember about Bonnars commentating was that he said he wanted another shot at griffin about 20 times. He sounded desperate

[mattsoper]

I love Rogan as a commentator..I think he is a great commentator...he adds to the action...his voice isn't boring...he's a funny guy...and him and mike goldberg click big time

[nsb7873]

Originally Posted by Alvin

Are you drinking?

Rogan does not know what he's talking about??????

Rogan is perfect for the UFC. He knows that game & can project an enthusiasm that is often needed in some fights.

It's easy to say Rogan or Goldberg are shite commentators, but IMO they're the bet the UFC have ever had. Although I didn't mind Blatnick in the ealry days either. Mauro (the Pride guy) does my head in with the way he talks, but again he does a good job well.

i don;t drink, but if you're new to mma and hear rogan, you get the wrong idea of what people are doing in the ring. you don;t use words like boring or other redundant stuff. he trains in jiu jitsu and gets some of the techniques wrong. iv'e followed mma since IVC and VAle tudo cause i trained with Relson Gracie, and other ba@ss jiu jitsu guys. and ive seen and gone through alot of commentators. and joe rogan is the worst one. couture is awesome and trigg also. they are more technical.

[Salvy_Mic]

Well, as long as Couture throws in another "He's got a huge **** on his forehead!" or "Yeah, the double head bounce...", then the world is a better place. For such a calm, mellow, easygoing guy, Couture has great dry, insider humor that can only come from a fighter. I was rolling when he said the latter.

[jmack123]

I think Rogan is a good commentator but i'm not exactly crying over him not being at 61

[ThaiRoundhouse]

I like him. hypes things up, moderately knowledgable and kinda funny. hope he comes back... ohh yeah, he's still better than frank trigg