Originally Posted by rivethead
But as for Matt Hughes, I'd say "There is no tangible proof Matt is racist" is a more accurate statement than the definitive MATT HUGHES is not.
I'm still waiting for a statement directly from Matt on this before I'm willing to give him 100% of the benefit of the doubt.
I see, so in your mind Hughes is guilty of being a racist until he is proven innocent, even though both his camp and the racist organization in question have stated UNCATEGORICALLY that Hughes has no affiliation with the organization whatsoever and that basically what he is guilty of is signing something and being photographed with it without due diligence.
Very interesting viewpoint.
Why was the name of my thread changed? I had the thread title as "White Boy Society debunks "racist Hughes" chatter" .... which is precisely what happened....somehow it changed from that to a watered down, weaksauce "issues statement"?
They did in fact issue a statement, but that's a tamer, watered down version of the truth which is that they themselves vindicated Hughes and supported what Hughes' own camp has said.
That in fact is what happened here, and that in fact was my original thread title, so the fact that it was intentionally CHANGED - an overt act - to this weaksauce version indicates someone has a particular axe to grind, and reality be damned, which I think is pretty sad.