MMA News Forums » MMA Forums » General MMA Forum

[Rhino_Man]

9 out of 10 times Rampages loses that fight, just so happen he had the 1 out of 10 he wins. I dont think anyone would argue Chuck is the better fighter. Not only the better fighter but a very dominating fighter

[Afro]

Originally Posted by Rhino_Man

9 out of 10 times Rampages loses that fight, just so happen he had the 1 out of 10 he wins. I dont think anyone would argue Chuck is the better fighter. Not only the better fighter but a very dominating fighter

Chuck got dominated though.. thats somethin no would argue about.

[Rhino_Man]

Afro,

Who is the better fighter Chuck or Rampage???

[Afro]

Originally Posted by Rhino_Man

Afro,

Who is the better fighter Chuck or Rampage???

Rampage

[Rhino_Man]

Your kidding me right???

Thats pretty silly, Next thing you will tell me Rashad Evans is a better fighter than Chuck also

[Afro]

Originally Posted by Rhino_Man

Your kidding me right???

Thats pretty silly, Next thing you will tell me Rashad Evans is a better fighter than Chuck also

Rampage beat him did he not? I rank Chuck higher, but Rampage beat Chuck so how can I say Chuck is better if he lost?

I think Rampage beats him again why is that so far-fetched if Rampage beat him once? its not far-fetched to think that Chuck will beat Rampage or Rampage will beat Chuck, just like its not far-fetched to think that Babalu is gonna beat Chuck and vice-versa, you really think that Rampage is that bad that you would bring up Rashad Evans? Nothing agains Evans but your bringing up a TUF fighter to make your case.. maybe you hate Rampage that much, but thats just your opinion but ima stick with mine, so far 1-0 for Rampage.. so im happy with my opinion.

[Rhino_Man]

Originally Posted by Afro Samurai

I disagree cuz he got beat, I dont like sayin that Chuck can beat a guy hes never beaten before especially when that guy beat him.. wheres the proof?
.

I find this funny because you are picking GSP over Hughes. The logic is not consistent.

[Afro]

Originally Posted by Rhino_Man

I find this funny because you are picking GSP over Hughes. The logic is not consistent.

theres no logic involved, I just see Rampage winning the rematch like he did the first time.. I just dont see why its so far-fetched to say that Rampage would win because hes beaten Chuck before.. I dont think anyone is saying Hughes has no chance right? well it sounds like Rampage has no chance according to everyone else right?

I think Rampage should be the favorite to win in a rematch as Hughes is the favorite against GSP, and Chuck is the favorite against Babalu.. doesnt mean that history will repeat itself.

But I just see Rampage winning again if they have a rematch AND IF Rampage climbs himself out of that small ditch he is in right now. Rampage is a lot younger and can grow more as a fighter, but hes been on a slight decline lately.. he'll have incline again if he wants to beat Chuck and I think he will.

[WandAXE]

The whole thing with Chuck when he fought Rampage was that he couldnt hurt Rampage. Talk about improving Rampage has done that. He isnt scared of Chuck . If I remember correctly Wand beat him twice. So we should allready no who is the best at 205. however Rampage would beat Chuck.

[Afro]

Originally Posted by WandAXE

The whole thing with Chuck when he fought Rampage was that he couldnt hurt Rampage. Talk about improving Rampage has done that. He isnt scared of Chuck . If I remember correctly Wand beat him twice. So we should allready no who is the best at 205. however Rampage would beat Chuck.

I agree, I believe Wandy is the best at 205, I dont see Chuck beating him either..

granted Chuck had 2 fights that night and that was his 2nd fight but whats a harder night?

facing Overeem and Rampage in the same night

or

facing Liddell and Silva in the same night?

Rampage beats Chuck, goes on and puts on a show against Silva.. granted he got beat but he didnt get dominated like Chuck did against Rampage.