MMA News Forums » MMA Forums » General MMA Forum

[Pasha K]

LOL a year ago everybody though that Hunt had nothing to do in UFC.
Now he is an option for a title shot is becoming a very very popular fighter even to people that did not watched Pride.

[Luc1an]

Ive always liked Hunt, but by no means does he deserve a title shot lol. It would be a pretty entertaining fight fight tho.

[roaddawg]

Originally Posted by Rocky>Fedor

LOL a year ago everybody though that Hunt had nothing to do in UFC.
Now he is an option for a title shot is becoming a very very popular fighter even to people that did not watched Pride.

He got my attention once he dropped Kongo (with ease I might add).

[RearNakedStroke]

Originally Posted by roaddawg

With or without an edge I still think Overeem would have defeated Lesnar and Hunt (who lost to Reem via an armbar).

So you are basically saying the lanky 205er that got handled by Chuck would have still beaten Lesnar and Hunt, because that's what he was without his "edge".

[roaddawg]

Originally Posted by RearNakedStroke

So you are basically saying the lanky 205er that got handled by Chuck would have still beaten Lesnar and Hunt, because that's what he was without his "edge".

Using your very strange and biased analogy yes because Overeem is widely considered to be an elite level striker with proven dominance in K-1.

- Overeem's striking is levels above Lesnar (not even comparable)
- Overeem's submission skills are better than Hunt's

Overeem beat both guys in areas where they were weakest.

The major flaw in your logic is you assume no evolution on Overeem's part nor can you prove he has actually faught anyone illegally.

[W.Silva>C.Norris]

Originally Posted by roaddawg

Using your very strange and biased analogy yes because Overeem is widely considered to be an elite level striker with proven dominance in K-1.

- Overeem's striking is levels above Lesnar (not even comparable)
- Overeem's submission skills are better than Hunt's

Overeem beat both guys in areas where they were weakest.

The major flaw in your logic is you assume no evolution on Overeem's part nor can you prove he has actually faught anyone illegally.

this is the internet, what does proof have to do with anything? clearly overeem's mom was giving him steroids mixed in with his baby formula. in fact, I did hear that the baby formula in question was purchased at balco.

that test that he aced in grade 1? tainted, he was taking ped's. that epic game of hide and go seek at his 12th birthday party? 12:1 test/epi ratio.

Is 'reem an idiot for failing a drug test? sure is. Does it taint everything he's ever accomplished? nope.

This whole debate is pretty typical of how people treat the famous. Often, I wonder if the more outspoken people on topics like this would look as clean under the same microscope that they use to judge the people who entertain them.