MMA News Forums » MMA Forums » General MMA Forum

[Supe]

Originally Posted by FCK

I think Belchers striking is good enough to hang with Bisping for sure, but I don't think he could hack the pace Bisping brings, and crumbles round 3.

Should make for a good fight, but I'm not sure why he's wanting to fight somebody ranked bellow him.

HAHAHAHA Really? You think Belcher could "hang" in the stirking dept? If Mike were to stand in front of Belcher, he wouldn't be standing to long. Al would chop his legs down and pound him out in 2 rounds. Belcher's jitz is WAYYYYYY above bispings too. Only advantage Mike has is wrestling. Bisping should stick to callin out the Mayhem Miller's of the world.

[Fedorlei Gomipierre]

When I just see that FCK has made a post in a Bisping thread, I can actually script it out in my mind nearly to a tee what he's going to say and that's not a good thing.

Objectivity is a beautiful thing.

[FCK]

Originally Posted by Fedorlei Gomipierre

When I just see that FCK has made a post in a Bisping thread, I can actually script it out in my mind nearly to a tee what he's going to say and that's not a good thing.

Objectivity is a beautiful thing.

No, no you really can't.

And Supe, if you think Bisping is gonna be so outclassed in the striking department compared to Bisping, then you forget how Bisping handled Sonnen, who was as good a wrestler, as Belcher is a striker.

Objectivity is a beautiful thing. Prejudgement tends to cloud that.

[_DCdoctr_]

RIP Pip!



BP

[Cat--Smasher]

Alan Belcher wants in on the Michael Bisping sweepstakes : Five Ounces of Pain

A day after Brian Stann came forward to proclaim his interest in a bout with Michael Bisping, fellow UFC middleweight Alan Belcher’s camp released a statement explaining “The Talent” not only wants to battle Bisping but has already received a phone call from UFC brass in relation to the rumble.

“Michael Bisping mentioned that he would like to fight Alan Belcher. Alan accepts! (UFC matchmaker) Joe Silva called,” wrote Duke Roufus on The Underground. The 28-year old Belcher has been a longtime staple at Roufus’ gym in Milwaukee.

[Rumble]

Originally Posted by FCK

No, no you really can't.

And Supe, if you think Bisping is gonna be so outclassed in the striking department compared to Bisping, then you forget how Bisping handled Sonnen, who was as good a wrestler, as Belcher is a striker.

Objectivity is a beautiful thing. Prejudgement tends to cloud that.

Bisping compared to Bisping? Anger clouds thought process.

[Fedorlei Gomipierre]

Apparently Michael Bisping is a world beater. Who knew?

[goodtimes]

Originally Posted by FCK

No, no you really can't.

And Supe, if you think Bisping is gonna be so outclassed in the striking department compared to Bisping, then you forget how Bisping handled Sonnen, who was as good a wrestler, as Belcher is a striker.

Objectivity is a beautiful thing. Prejudgement tends to cloud that.

Yes, yes he can. Just about everyone knows what you're going to say in a Bisping thread before you say it. Claiming your objective while others have prejudgment is laughable.

Case in point? You're claiming that Bisping handled Sonnen in a fight he lost. Sure it was close, but he didn't "handle" him, he struggled really hard and lost.

OK, for the sake of argument let's assume Bisping did in fact win, and he got screwed by the judges, and he beat a good wrestler. Somehow you use that to draw parallel's between Sonnen's wrestling and Belcher's striking? Comparing two completely different opponents, with nearly diametrically opposite styles, and using that as your talking point? That doesn't even make sense.

[Sniggles]

Originally Posted by FCK

No, no you really can't.

And Supe, if you think Bisping is gonna be so outclassed in the striking department compared to Bisping, then you forget how Bisping handled Sonnen, who was as good a wrestler, as Belcher is a striker.

Objectivity is a beautiful thing. Prejudgement tends to cloud that.

1 month avatar bet that Belcher beats Bisping right now!

If you lose your avatar will be...

[Fedorlei Gomipierre]

Originally Posted by FCK

No, no you really can't.

And Supe, if you think Bisping is gonna be so outclassed in the striking department compared to Bisping, then you forget how Bisping handled Sonnen, who was as good a wrestler, as Belcher is a striker.

Objectivity is a beautiful thing. Prejudgement tends to cloud that.

Objectivity as defined by:
Bisping HANDLED Sonnen in wrestling(WRONG).
So therefore, he'll handle Belcher in the striking(DOUBLE WRONG).
Nearly zero logic or little things called facts or statistics to back up your scarily deductive and tautologically flawed argument.

When it comes to Michael Bisping threads, your posts are the least objective on these boards and that says something. All of us are die hard fans of alot of fighters, but rarely do I see someone so blatantly ignorant of their fave's shortcomings. In short, you're a Bisping mark and any potential nuggets of insight you MAY be able to provide is ultimately clouded by your blind and UNobjective stance on 99.97% of all things Bisping-related.

When you post on Bisping threads, it probably gets a near unanimous eyeroll.

Objectivity IS a beautiful thing, so is credibility. You have neither.