MMA News Forums » MMA Forums » General MMA Forum

[dbader08]

lol @ Rampage.

Forrest easily won 2 out of 3 rounds.

Originally Posted by popsicle

Im not saying that there should be a controversy. I had Forrest winning the fight also. All I am saying is that the argument can be made that Tito did more damage, and had Forrest in more danger. Some people may feel that it is more important to put your opponent in danger than to land a high volume of softer strikes that are not doing much damage.

Forrest was doing decent damage with his shots, and I don't really feel Tito had Forrest in any real trouble except for a slight bit in the 3rd

[fuzzrocks5285]

lol @ rampage still being mad forrest him....griffin won 2/3 rounds, period.

[YukonJordan]

I had Tito winning rounds 1 and 3 by very close margins. Largely based on impressions, maybe I'm weighting strike that knock your opponent to ground too heavily.

That said I can see the argument for the other side.

[Masscore]

I agree the score card but when it comes to the fight every significant thing that happened it was Ortiz doing it to Griffin. He was the one to rock Griffin and he was the one to take Griffin down. If this was Pride I would not be surprised if Ortiz got the decision. But with the scoring in the UFC Griffin is the clear cut winner.

[Rise]

Let's hope Rampage doesn't land a judges job after his last fight cause he's way off base on this one. A couple knockdowns that don't lead to anything are hardly a basis for winning a fight.