![]() |
Cain Velasquez Delivers Record Setting Performance in Win over JDS UFC 155: Cain Velasquez Delivers Record Setting Performance in Win over JDS | Bleacher Report http://img.bleacherreport.net/img/im...650&h=440&q=75 Quote:
|
You say others are ahead of him RJ what pecking order does the UFC use these day honestly. I agree with ya he has others infront of him right now. |
After first glace I almost wanted to go check what the highest number of TDs GSP has ever landed in a fight.....then I started thinking, While what Cain did was very impressive, It could also be noted that JDS got up a shit load of times. And the reason a guy like GSP doesnt get 11 TDs in a 5 round fight is because once he takes his opponents down they stay down for much longer. As far as who gets the next title shot, im not too concerned about it, theres lots of interesting matchups with both JDS and Cain. If Ao wins, he probably gets the next shot. If BF wins, then JDS/Bf sounds good. I Werdum wins, and AO losses, I could see Werdum getting the next shot. Then we'll get JDS/AO. Theres lots of matchups to be made at HW with only BF/Cain2 and JDS/Nog not happening anytime soon. |
Quote:
|
Im thinking that jds should fight overeem next win or lose |
I'd really hate to be Jds's next opponent lol. |
First heavyweight in the history of the UFC to score a triple-double? |
Let's not forget that the winner of Struve vs Hunt is in serious title talks. |
Quote:
As for GSP and his takedowns, the reason he lasts longer on the ground is because he usually tries to end up in guard. Then it takes one or two minutes to pass guard. With Cain, he takes someone down so he ends up in side control or on someone's back. Another key difference is that GSP fights more explosive fighters that can burst out in later rounds and in the heavyweight division, if it's in the second or later rounds, the HW's energy is probably shot by then.. |
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:21 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.