How does he have oodles of talent? Like someone else pointed out whenever he has fought a top fighter he has lost and lost in one-sided fashion. A guy with "oodles" of talent will beat or at least compete with those guys. He is a guy with heavy hands and one of the worse ground games in the UFC. He should be cut to make room for guys that are actually you know, good.
Opinions are like assholes, ya know?
Quote:
Originally Posted by CtGreat
Why the fuck did he ever leave Jacksons?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sakara=Excitement
If there is anyone on the forums who I could see having sex with a tranny, it would be Pashak.
How does he have oodles of talent? Like someone else pointed out whenever he has fought a top fighter he has lost and lost in one-sided fashion. A guy with "oodles" of talent will beat or at least compete with those guys. He is a guy with heavy hands and one of the worse ground games in the UFC. He should be cut to make room for guys that are actually you know, good.
That's a little strong. He does not have one of the worse ground games in the UFC.
How does he have oodles of talent? Like someone else pointed out whenever he has fought a top fighter he has lost and lost in one-sided fashion. A guy with "oodles" of talent will beat or at least compete with those guys. He is a guy with heavy hands and one of the worse ground games in the UFC. He should be cut to make room for guys that are actually you know, good.
You do realize talent does not always equate to success right? With his athleticism, he could be at the top of the division. If he worked on fixing his holes, and employing a smart game plan he could have beat some of those guys he lost too. Instead he goes into every fight relying on his speed and power. He is his own worst enemy.
__________________
"If a man with no arms and a man with no legs started learning karate, the same light bulb would appear over every head in Japan. That’s right: Glue them together and see if it can kill a panda."
I would say it depends entirely on what it costs to have him fight. Lets be realistic. Melvin will never be a serious contender at 155. He's a gatekeeper, or a mid-tier fighter at best. If you're paying him gatekeeper money, its worth keeping him. If he's got an inflated price tag, he's very cuttable.
How does he have oodles of talent? Like someone else pointed out whenever he has fought a top fighter he has lost and lost in one-sided fashion. A guy with "oodles" of talent will beat or at least compete with those guys. He is a guy with heavy hands and one of the worse ground games in the UFC. He should be cut to make room for guys that are actually you know, good.
That's been my perspective too. He's fast and has a ton of power. But he's been clipped standing up more than once and he's been submitted a couple of times too...
He looks athletic. Unless we focus on him not taking training seriously and discount the many years he's been in the game, I'd say it's clear that he struggles to get any of the skills of MMA up to an elite level. And that is really what athleticism is about.
Quote:
Originally Posted by W.Silva>C.Norris
I would say it depends entirely on what it costs to have him fight. Lets be realistic. Melvin will never be a serious contender at 155. He's a gatekeeper, or a mid-tier fighter at best. If you're paying him gatekeeper money, its worth keeping him. If he's got an inflated price tag, he's very cuttable.
Perfectly said.
__________________
"If it was old school MMA I would just take @bisping down and lay on him til he died of starvation."
Linear Mode
