![]() |
Pat Healy says UFC move ‘a done deal,' wants to ‘mix it up' with Joe Lauzon Strikeforce results: Pat Healy says UFC move ?a done deal,' wants to ?mix it up' with Joe Lauzon - MMAmania.com Quote:
|
Healy is going to draw a blanket in his octagon debut likely releasing him from the organization. No way ever would the waste a Lauzon fight with Healy. |
Quote:
|
I'd love to see him fight Lauzon but they'll most likely start him out with an easier opponent. |
Melendez should have to fight Healy. Pulling out of a fight with an injury does not automatically grant you a step up in competition. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
If Healy is such a step down, why was he scheduled to fight Gil then? Clearly Gil figured he was a good enough fighter when he signed the initial contract. I just think that if a guy pulls out of a fight with an injury, then starts looking for the same level of competition a win would have earned him, that its unfair to those who actually trained and fought. |
Quote:
|
I definately want to see Healy/Gil. To begin, I thought it was kind of a joke that Healy was the BEST title contender Strikeforce had to offer Gil(but still believe he earned the title shot) and even thought that he lost the Hirota bout by decision, but Gil & Healy been matched up twice now, with two cancelled fights due to Gil's injuries(the second of which I'm a tad incredulous of) and IMO, it was something of a reprieve for Gil, because Healy is such a sleeper. I think there's something of a stigma attached to Gil having bowed out of two fights with Healy and I'd like to see him put it to bed with a win against Healy before he gets a title fight. Having Gil defend the SF title on a UFC card would be a "title fight" they can promote and unveil Gil to the UFC casuals. Make no mistake, Gil would be the heavy favourite, however I think Healy is a helluva out for him and I wouldn't be surprised one bit if Healy pulled it out. |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:35 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.