 | |
01-15-2013, 07:26 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
Status: The I.Q. Poster Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Greater Toronto Area. Posts: 11,751
|
If this was nearly anyone but Rampage, I could appreciate some valid frustration here, but after the UFC 86 situation and how ZUFFA handled it and stood by him and Rampage's subsequent long-term bone-headedness, I think he's gone faaaaaar out of his way to burn bridges with ZUFFA, to a degree where I think it's obvious that they aren't going to be cordial, accessible and agreeable to his "final requests" and will look to stick it to him on the way out(hence the Glover match-up).
In a way, I liken this pettiness to the "Greatest Strikeforce Moment" vote from Saturday night, where "The Losses of Fedor Emelianenko" was shown over and over again, akin to ZUFFA spiking the football on somebody they didn't do good business with. Similarily to why Frank Shamrock is basically invisible from UFC lore despite being one of their most dominant champions EVER.
It isn't a surprise that ZUFFA is being petty on the way out the door, it isn't the first nor the last fighter who they'll look to "make an example of"....
__________________ MY MMA RANKINGS HW Velasquez Cigano Werdum Cormier Bigfoot Barnett Mir Browne LHW Jones Machida Evans Hendo Davis Goose Teixeira Shogun Mousasi Bader MW ASilva Rockhold Belfort Weidman Jacare Okami Kennedy Consta Belcher Boetsch WW GSP Hendricks Condit MacDonald Diaz Maia Fitch Kampmann Ellenberger Pyle LW Bendo Alvarez Maynard Melendez Thomson J.Miller Diaz Pettis Chandler Grant dos Anjos FW Aldo Mendes Curran Lamas Frankie Zombie BW Cruz Barao Fernandes Faber Moraes
|
| |
01-15-2013, 09:02 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
| | Reputation: ∞
Status: Curses, foiled again! Join Date: Aug 2009 Posts: 12,373
| |
| |
01-15-2013, 10:29 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
Location: Where I live? No I ask the questions here Posts: 18,200
|
I guess Lugz said no?
__________________ There are many paths to freedom....not all are peaceful. |
| |
01-16-2013, 12:43 AM
|
#14 (permalink)
| | Reputation: ∞
Status: Champion Join Date: Sep 2008 Posts: 1,522
|
Interesting that Reebok even wants to associate their brand with him at this point in his career and with some of the dumb stuff he's done/said in the last little bit.
|
| |
01-16-2013, 12:55 AM
|
#15 (permalink)
| | Reputation: ∞
Status: nocturnal poster Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 2,532
|
I could care less about people opinions of Rampage at this point. Why won't the UFC allow Reebok to sponsor Rampage is a much bigger question? Surely Nike pulled some strings here.
__________________
Hating on Anderson Silva before it was the cool thing to do.
The idea of a "true number one contender" is the stupidiest MMA idea to be perpetuated by fans and media, EVER.
|
| |
01-16-2013, 04:18 AM
|
#16 (permalink)
| | Reputation: ∞
Status: Yup... You Mad Join Date: Feb 2009 Posts: 6,863
| Quote:
Originally Posted by CtGreat Regardless of his actual record, he was/is popular as shit. The UFC sees fit to capitalize off his popularity even though his record is shitty, yet they don't see fit to allow his sponsors in the cage. Lets not act like the heads at ZUFFA aren't smart business men. They aren't taking pity on him by continuing to give him fights so he can work, his salary is in his contract, if they gave him less then he would have grounds to sue them. Clearly they think his name is big enough to draw in enough viewers to offset the cost of having to pay him; in fact, they would lose money on their investment if they didn't work every last drop out of it. Rampage wants to maximize his popularity and value as a Brand, being able to show off your sponsors name in the cage is important. | Well said but you also have to remember people here hate Rampage and won't likely look at topics like these objectively. It is what it is.
__________________
Anderson Silva:
Best Fighter on the planet. |
| |
01-16-2013, 04:56 AM
|
#17 (permalink)
| | Reputation: ∞
Status: Ed Soares's #1 contender Join Date: Oct 2010 Posts: 1,808
|
The UFC basically has a dress code, it is a fairly loose one, but as UFC employees the fighters have to follow it. I am sure some of the people defending Rampage here have a dress code at their job too, and I bet they don't publicly complain about it because it may result in their termination. I disagree with alot of what the UFC does, but not this.
|
| |
01-16-2013, 05:14 AM
|
#18 (permalink)
| | Reputation: 750+
Status: Amateur Join Date: May 2009 Location: New Albany, In Posts: 352
| Quote:
Originally Posted by YukonJordan I could care less about people opinions of Rampage at this point. Why won't the UFC allow Reebok to sponsor Rampage is a much bigger question? Surely Nike pulled some strings here. | yes, I don't much care for the way Zuffa handles sponsors and the gross amount $$$ they charge for a fighter to wear their sponsors name into the cage. I have no problem with the company making money, though that move to charge fighters sponsors was one of pure greed and I found it deplorable.
|
| |
01-16-2013, 05:43 AM
|
#19 (permalink)
| | Reputation: 1000+
Status: robusto Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Ontario Posts: 1,149
| Quote:
Originally Posted by roaddawg Well said but you also have to remember people here hate Rampage and won't likely look at topics like these objectively. It is what it is. | 100% true, every Rampage thread is the same.
I will say the same thing about Page that I always do as well. He is the dumbest person in the UFC. Did he really think a sponsor that directly competes with Nike would be allowed to be shown?
__________________ |
| |
01-16-2013, 05:53 AM
|
#20 (permalink)
| | Reputation: 1000+
Status: The People's Champion Join Date: May 2007 Location: Minneapolis, Mn Posts: 990
| Quote:
Originally Posted by v3xi 100% true, every Rampage thread is the same.
I will say the same thing about Page that I always do as well. He is the dumbest person in the UFC. Did he really think a sponsor that directly competes with Nike would be allowed to be shown? | Yea the UFC isn't going to risk upsetting Nike. That swoosh is a step towards legitimacy. I dunno why but I still think Rampage has a vintage performance left in him for Glover
|
| |  | | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is On | | | All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:54 PM. |
| Quick Member Login Top 5 Latest Threads Latest MMA News Advertisements |