![]() |
Dana White responds to ‘typical' Anderson Silva-Ed Soares ‘craziness' UFC Quick Quote: Dana White responds to Quote:
|
We're waiting on something.... Rashad v Silva great fight in my opinion. That said, I dont think the lil nog fight is really that easy, but I see Rashad pulling a UD |
It's not up to the champion to decide who is a "worthy challenger." It's up to his boss to decide. If he doesn't think Weidman is "worthy" then he shouldn't complain. He should go in there, do his job, and collect what he thinks would be an easy pay day. He's faced less worthy opponents before without complaining... Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Not to say Dan Henderson was not qualified (as he was) but Hendo just lost to Rampage when he had the title fight with Anderson. So getting a title shot after a loss isn't as abnormal is it seems. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Chris is the most deserving contender at this time but a Rockhold unification title fight could happen and still have some respect to the weight class title. This is why I like brackets it's simple who your next match is, and there still will be room to jockey fights due to injuries and such. It's not like the UFC title holder is going up against Belator's or M1's it's all in house title fights. So the UFC has total control, but instead they will sacrafice creditablity for extra dollars today with WWE antic's. |
Quote:
(not directed at you) And on the issue of champ vs champ I think it works if it makes sense (wouldn't mind if Rockhold or Cormier got an immediate shot), but it should definitely not be set in stone that a champ from a different org gets an immediate Title shot. Safferdine is a good example of when it shouldnt happen. |
Quote:
I also agree on the brackets idea but it just seems the UFC has too many fighters to make that work. |
Agree Cat brackets wouldn't work for every fighter in a div. Some idea's that might lead to a better system. Bracketing top ten with a points system were other still gain points to possibly jump from say 16 to 9. Points could come from a win, record, strikes, takedowns, Ko's, Sub's, control, showmens ship, and ect... Lose points by turning down fights chosing to take time off/ basically be able to fight 3 times a year/ be avalible to fight after 100 days or lose points. Hopefully this would give a strong record of top 4 to show who the next contender should be instead of crazy match making we have seen lately for titles. I know this isn't perfect, but a starting point to something better hopefully. |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:02 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.