Another fight for UFC 62 - Page 6

nole · 07-06-2006, 04:54 PM

I dont think terrell would loss to silva. Terrell is great on the ground and that is exactly where the fight would go. Lets not forget terrells KO power either though, nobody gave terrell a chance against lindland and look what happend ( KO in 24 sec. ). But it doesnt matter anyway he is fighting nathan first

Anthony · 07-06-2006, 06:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nole

no need to get pissed and i didnt think you meant you didnt like the fight, I thought you meant you didnt believe me. My bad. I have never even been on sherdog so what is that shit.

Well you attacked me so I attacked back.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Noob

Did you really measure the distance? Oh, and kudos. I second that entire motion.

No I didnt measure it. I figured someone would have seen that I copied it from Maddox. Check this guy out.
http://maddox.xmission.com/

I want to make a public statement.......yummitree has to be the coolest forum name, EVER.

mattsoper · 07-06-2006, 09:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by paul

oh god terrell silva would be big lose for terrell and another big win for silva to take him straight to rich id like to see forrest against rashad and i think they should do bisping and bonnar since he just lost to rashad he drops down a bit why not have a tuf fighter frenzy on the card because rashad is really the only person left for forrest and i think bisping/hamill would be good but i give it to bisping and i think bisping/bonnar would be better and i think it would be a great win for bisping to come in on

If bonnar loses bisping this time...man he is going to move down in the rankings....that would be two in a row and his last win wasn't very convincing

Noob · 07-06-2006, 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mattsoper

If bonnar loses bisping this time...man he is going to move down in the rankings....that would be two in a row and his last win wasn't very convincing

Bonnar losing to Bisping would put a big dent in his career. He'd have to mount quite a win streak after that to redeem himself.

killerinstinct · 07-06-2006, 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Noob

Bonnar losing to Bisping would put a big dent in his career. He'd have to mount quite a win streak after that to redeem himself.

yeah they need to give Bonnar some tune up fights to make him look good so they can still set up the Bonnar/Griffin II fight.

Noob · 07-06-2006, 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by killerinstinct

yeah they need to give Bonnar some tune up fights to make him look good so they can still set up the Bonnar/Griffin II fight.

That's not a bad idea. I think at this point I would give a decided edge to Griffin though. He seems as though he has improved a little more than Bonnar, though you could make the argument that they have just been fighting different people. A tune-up would be good.

nole · 07-06-2006, 10:43 PM

Who should bisping fight in 62 if he gets the chance, maybe matt hamill.

Noob · 07-06-2006, 10:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nole

Who should bisping fight in 62 if he gets the chance, maybe matt hamill.

That seems to be the popular pick. I would like to see him fight one more time before fighting Hammill. I think he could use a little more experience before fighting someone of Hammill's wrestling abilities. That being said, if he could develop some takedown defense and keep the fight on the feet, I don't think he would have a problem.

nole · 07-06-2006, 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Noob

That seems to be the popular pick. I would like to see him fight one more time before fighting Hammill. I think he could use a little more experience before fighting someone of Hammill's wrestling abilities. That being said, if he could develop some takedown defense and keep the fight on the feet, I don't think he would have a problem.

who should bisping fight, forrest? I want hammill to fight rashad.