 | |
07-09-2006, 03:31 PM
|
#21 (permalink)
| | Reputation: 1000+
Status: Lurker Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 2,585
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by liddell316 Sucks so bad he beat Silva.
Tito will always be a big draw in UFC. |
I don't think Tito sucks, but that fight vs Wand was a long time ago. I don't see the same outcome today.
|
| |
07-09-2006, 04:38 PM
|
#22 (permalink)
| | Reputation: 200+
Status: Champion Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Nova Scotia Posts: 1,572
|
No, but I was just trying to make a point in how....
EVERY Chuck Liddell hater brings up him against Jackson which was years ago. How is Tito/Silva any different?
|
| |
07-09-2006, 05:39 PM
|
#23 (permalink)
| | Reputation: 1000+
Status: Lurker Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 2,585
|
I know what you mean, but why bring yourself to their level? Chuck is obviously a better fighter than Rampage at the moment.
|
| |
07-09-2006, 08:02 PM
|
#24 (permalink)
| | Reputation: 10-14
Status: Rookie Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 10
|
Shamrock? He fuckn sucks If you think he is any good you dont know shit.
You must be like 12 to think that. He is a true legend, and a pioneer of MMA. In Japan they idolize his shoot fighting, and submission skills. Yeah he is pretty old now, but in his prime he would own everyone in his weight class, and even some heavier guys. He is one of the best all around fighters in MMA history.
|
| |
07-09-2006, 08:24 PM
|
#25 (permalink)
| | Reputation: 10-14
Status: Amateur Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 292
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by Ry-Jon Jinn Shamrock? He fuckn sucks If you think he is any good you dont know shit.
You must be like 12 to think that. He is a true legend, and a pioneer of MMA. In Japan they idolize his shoot fighting, and submission skills. Yeah he is pretty old now, but in his prime he would own everyone in his weight class, and even some heavier guys. He is one of the best all around fighters in MMA history. | You could turn the clock back 10 years and Shamrock would still get owned by Tito and the other top LHW's in MMA today.
Shamrock never had that great of a career. He never won a tournanment event against guys that weren't that skilled back in the day.
__________________ |
| |
07-09-2006, 09:20 PM
|
#26 (permalink)
| | Reputation: 10-14
Status: Rookie Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 64
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by Rhino_Man You could turn the clock back 10 years and Shamrock would still get owned by Tito and the other top LHW's in MMA today.
Shamrock never had that great of a career. He never won a tournanment event against guys that weren't that skilled back in the day. | Shamrock did have a great career. So he did not win a tournament. The guy has skills. No one would get as far as he did if they sucked. Ken was the only one that could compete with Royce. Some people don't think Royce was good, but he won 3 of the first 4 UFC's when they fought multiple times in a night. Shamrock ain't what he used to be, but to say he sucks is really unfair. Hell, Steve Jennum won UFC 3 in 1994 as a replacement for Shamrock and had a career record of 2-3 as of 2/97.
Last edited by theone; 07-09-2006 at 09:23 PM.
|
| |
07-09-2006, 09:34 PM
|
#27 (permalink)
| | Reputation: 10-14
Status: Amateur Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 292
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by theone Shamrock did have a great career. So he did not win a tournament. The guy has skills. No one would get as far as he did if they sucked. Ken was the only one that could compete with Royce. Some people don't think Royce was good, but he won 3 of the first 4 UFC's when they fought multiple times in a night. Shamrock ain't what he used to be, but to say he sucks is really unfair. Hell, Steve Jennum won UFC 3 in 1994 as a replacement for Shamrock and had a career record of 2-3 as of 2/97. |
I never said Shamrock sucked, but his career is based more on Hype than record. Fact is Tito would beat the Shamrock of 10 years ago
__________________ |
| |
07-09-2006, 10:00 PM
|
#28 (permalink)
| | Reputation: 10-14
Status: Rookie Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 64
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by Rhino_Man I never said Shamrock sucked, but his career is based more on Hype than record. Fact is Tito would beat the Shamrock of 10 years ago | I think that he is a lot of hype now, but he was good in his prime. He fights different now. He has 2 career knockouts (I think), and now he wants to stand in the middle of mat a swing with Tito. That is not what he does well. About 1/3 of his wins were from submission. As far as for Tito 10 years ago no one will ever know that. Oh, and the sucked comment is something I got from you writting that he could not beat the inferior competion years ago, so he must have not been that good. Shamrock went 6-2-2 in the 90's and Tito went 4-2 during that same time and that is when Shamrock was facing the top competion and Tito was just starting.
Last edited by theone; 07-09-2006 at 10:03 PM.
|
| |
07-12-2006, 06:14 PM
|
#29 (permalink)
|
|
i think that evans would be good forest too but no more shamrock !!!!!!!!
| |
| |
07-12-2006, 09:11 PM
|
#30 (permalink)
| | Reputation: 10-14
Status: Team Pride Member Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 505
|
Tito who really cares man , he is like wwe character he hypes a fight up. He actually made you guys think that the Tito Sham was going to be a legit match. That whole thing was a joke.
|
| |  | | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is On | | | All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:15 PM. |
| Quick Member Login Top 5 Latest Threads Latest MMA News Advertisements |