MMA News Forums » MMA Forums » General MMA Forum » MMA 'Dream' Matches

[Rufio]

Frank's the more well rounded fighter, but Ken was bigger and stronger. Frank beat Tito; we know Ken's record against Tito. Ken's record against Bas Rutten is better than Frank's. Frank beat Suzuki, who beat Ken. Both of them traded wins with Funaki.


Who takes it?

[CHUCKtheCHAMP]

in there primes i think ken could take it cause of the size diff. but frank has alot of tools and could finish the fight anywhere, and ken would need a leg lock, jucky punch or sum mean ass gnp.

i say ken cuz the size diff..

[AJL416AZ]

ken in his prime was a physical monster. he was quick as fuck, strong as an ox. his submission game was fast, and his wrestling was solid

Frank had a weakness with big guys wrestling IMO, getting handled by Tito when it came to the takedowns. Frank was slick as fuck on the ground though, constant movement and chain submissions. his standup was solid, and he had some good KO power

but i would go with Ken because all he needed was a bum rush, the takedown, and a leg. then it was tap or snap

[Rufio]

The thing about Tito is that while he took Frank down with ease (same as he did with Ken), Frank was too skilled and fast for Tito to do much damage even with the superior position. However, I think Ken in his prime was faster than Tito so maybe he could've landed some solid hits.