|
View Poll Results: Ken Shamrock vs. Mark Coleman | |
Ken Shamrock by KO
|     | 1 | 2.94% | |
Ken Shamrock by Sub
|    | 6 | 17.65% | |
Ken Shamrock by Decision
|    | 5 | 14.71% | |
Mark Coleman by KO
|    | 12 | 35.29% | |
Mark Coleman by Sub
|    | 4 | 11.76% | |
Mark Coleman by Decision
|    | 6 | 17.65% |
 | | 
06-05-2007, 01:37 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
| | Reputation: 300+
Status: Amateur Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 280
|
Who cares if Colemans on steroids? Its not hurting any of us if he takes em or not. The old-school Coleman was an ANIMAL and would destroy Shamrock.
Best case scenario: this fantasy matchup takes place in UFC 2 when they were really fighting. Without a bunch of pansy-ass rules to protect shamrock when he pulls guard, Coleman would make a bloody mess of him within 5 minutes using GNP and the single best weapon against the guard, the headbutt.
| 
|  | |
06-05-2007, 04:29 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
Status: Lurker Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 4
|
I said Coleman be submission.. He's made alot of guys tap due to strikes (which counts as a sub I think) I would probably see him doing that to Ken...
If Colman's wearing shoes that would play against him big time though, seeing as it would only it easier for to slip an ankle lock on him..
I would say Coleman 7/10 times
| |
| | |
06-05-2007, 05:37 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
| | Reputation: ∞
Status: Xcel Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 1,642
|
right now coleman, but shamrock would have taken it on his prime
| |
| | |
06-05-2007, 05:44 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
| | Reputation: 65-69
Status: Contender Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 502
|
I think Shamrock would submit him,if we are talking Prime.
| |
| | |
06-05-2007, 06:24 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
| | Reputation: ∞
Status: Banned Again In 4...3...2 Join Date: May 2007 Location: MMA Spot . com Posts: 2,620
|
Coleman via Guillotene
__________________ CAUTION: This poster is prone to outbursts of unthinkable obscenities. If you encounter one of these incredible tirades, please do not provoke him further. This poster has been known to place himself, and his foes in a position to be banned. The best way to avoid such incidents would be to avoid stating anything negative about Jake Shields. | |
| | |
06-05-2007, 06:28 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
Status: Banned Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: The mean streets of Harlem Posts: 7,370
|
Quote: |
Originally Posted by danny420 right now coleman, but shamrock would have taken it on his prime | I agree. Sub wrestling > freestyle wrestling.
In Coleman's prime he didn't know many subs at all except for Can openers and neck cranks. Ken would have snapped his leg off after Coleman beat him senseless by GNP IMO.
Ken by sub 2nd rd.
| |
| | |
06-05-2007, 08:53 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
| | Reputation: 65-69
Status: Contender Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 502
|
Exactly,and really how often did Shamrock get knocked out in his Prime?I think never.
| |
| | |
06-05-2007, 09:05 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
| | Reputation: ∞
Status: IM THE CHAMP! Join Date: May 2006 Location: Miami FL Posts: 12,493
|
Wow this is the worse poll ive ever seen
__________________ "CB Dollaway made a bad decision and now he gets a 2nd chance to earn a victory tonight against CB Dollaway" - Mike Goldberg Fav MMA: Sudo, Stevenson, Shields, Kid, Werdum, Hendo, Rampage, Gomi, Sakurai, Okami, Penn, Kawajiri, Big Nogs
Fav Boxers: Sam Peter, RJJ, Pacman, Dawson, Frazier, Hatton, Winky Wright, Paul Williams, SSM, Miranda, Cotto, Linares
| |
| | |
06-05-2007, 09:12 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
| | Reputation: ∞
Status: Ticallion Stallion Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Calgary, Canada Posts: 4,584
|
Quote: |
Originally Posted by bigdog887503 Who cares if Colemans on steroids? Its not hurting any of us if he takes em or not. The old-school Coleman was an ANIMAL and would destroy Shamrock.
Best case scenario: this fantasy matchup takes place in UFC 2 when they were really fighting. Without a bunch of pansy-ass rules to protect shamrock when he pulls guard, Coleman would make a bloody mess of him within 5 minutes using GNP and the single best weapon against the guard, the headbutt. | lol why did you bumb this thread up?
__________________  | |
| | |
06-05-2007, 11:20 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
| | Reputation: ∞
Status: /G\ Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Southern California Posts: 4,803
|
 @ the poll
Coleman by KO???
i highly doubt it.
Coleman defeated Vovchanchyn in the tournament by TKO Knees but that was a tired gassed out Vovchanchyn. And i remember Coleman defeating Don Frye by TKO.
in their primes Shamrock would win by Sub. now, Coleman would probably take it to a decision. too close to call.
__________________ Gegard Mousasi- 25-2-1  "However great the kindness and the efficiency, in every hospital death there will be some cruel, squalid detail, something perhaps too small to be told but leaving terribly painful memories behind, arising out of the haste, the crowding, the impersonality of a place where every day people are dying among strangers" | |
| | | |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
| | |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:06 PM.
|
| Quick Member Login Top 5 Latest Threads Latest MMA News Advertisements |
