Ken Shamrock vs. Mark Coleman, who would win?

Caspel · 06-26-2006, 10:31 AM

Who would take this respective match-up? Both fighters in their prime, it would be a tough call in my own opinion.

Ken Shamrock was in his prime about 12 years ago in 1994 with huge wins over Maurice Smith, Bas Rutten, Masakatsu Funaki, Manabu Yamada and others.

Mark Coleman started out his career with huge wins over Gary Goodridge, Dan Severn, and Don Frye. He lost three fights in a row to be removed from the UFC but came back with fighting in Pride in great condition with a 6 win streak.

Both fight close to each other's respective walking weight. Who would take it in your own opinion?

nole · 06-26-2006, 10:36 AM

i think coleman would uses his roid rage and do what rich did to ken

kickass32 · 06-26-2006, 10:44 AM

If Coleman has any Cardio, I'd go Coleman VIA KO

WorldsMostDangerousMan · 06-26-2006, 11:17 AM

tough call indeed, judging from alot of the fights of Coleman's that I've seen his cardio isn't that great, I'm thinking He would get tired and very sloppy and Shamrock would catch him in a submission

Afro · 06-26-2006, 11:53 AM

I went with Coleman by decision

prideFAN · 06-26-2006, 12:02 PM

Today they both suck but if I had to choose I'ed say Coleman, roid rage knock out.

WandAXE · 06-26-2006, 12:10 PM

Coleman ko , in a Pride ring. UfC Coleman without roids would still win in a boring dec.

Caspel · 06-26-2006, 06:37 PM

dang Coleman has a big advantage it looks like.

HollywoodHogan · 06-27-2006, 10:39 AM

I think coleman is a better athlete over all and would defeat Shamrock. I mean didn't Coleman beat Kurt Angle once in a wrestling match? I think Ken could have a chance if he let the match prolong for a long time until Mark is so tired that he can barely stands.