Reply to Thread

Post a reply to the thread: Tito and Forrest.........

Your Message

Click here to log in

What Is The Last Name Of UFC's Iceman?

 
 

You may choose an icon for your message from this list

Additional Options

  • Will turn www.example.com into [URL]http://www.example.com[/URL].

HTML

Topic Review (Newest First)

  • 08-26-2006, 09:46 PM
    Kewl144
    Quote Originally Posted by killerinstinct
    You're funny!You get outclassed in a debate and in order to make up for that you take cheap shots at someones spelling.
    I commented on his grammar and not his spelling. Oh and yet again all you're doing it repeating what someone else has said. So what do you even post? I should have commented on his intelligence because he's trying to argue about something that he doesnt even understand.
  • 08-26-2006, 08:28 PM
    killerinstinct
    Quote Originally Posted by Kewl144
    You're, not your. And the majority of people already agree that Forrest lost that fight. Hell even Forrest agrees that he lost but some people seem to disagree with the guy who was in the fight. Anyway, hopefully, you spend more time trying to understand the rules before you showcase your ignorance again.
    You're funny!You get outclassed in a debate and in order to make up for that you take cheap shots at someones spelling.
  • 08-26-2006, 05:57 PM
    Kewl144
    Quote Originally Posted by Afro Samurai
    LOL @ no one agreeing with you. I think your the one that needs to stop posting.
    You're, not your. And the majority of people already agree that Forrest lost that fight. Hell even Forrest agrees that he lost but some people seem to disagree with the guy who was in the fight. Anyway, hopefully, you spend more time trying to understand the rules before you showcase your ignorance again.
  • 08-26-2006, 04:53 PM
    Afro
    Quote Originally Posted by Kewl144
    Again, why do you even post? All you do is repeat what others have said before you. Try not to post unless you actually have something original (or at least something to contribute that the person right before you hasnt tried to argue) to say.
    LOL @ no one agreeing with you. I think your the one that needs to stop posting.
  • 08-26-2006, 05:31 AM
    Kewl144
    Quote Originally Posted by killerinstinct
    To say that elbows from the bottom don't do any damage is ridiculous.Why don't you get on top of a good fighter and let him elbow you to the face and then tell me they don't do damage.Watch Riggs fight with Lytle-elbows from the bottom can end a fight.
    Again, why do you even post? All you do is repeat what others have said before you. Try not to post unless you actually have something original (or at least something to contribute that the person right before you hasnt tried to argue) to say.
  • 08-26-2006, 05:29 AM
    killerinstinct
    Quote Originally Posted by hops69
    what are you the almighty one on UFC kewl? deliverin elbows while on the bottom cant do anything, are inneffective? its funny that you can sit at ur comp screeen and actually type that up.... it amazes me that you can say this. for instance very recently on TUF 4 the one guy was on the bottom and delivered an elbow and busted the guys head open in an instant... while he got dominated thew hole fight that one shot was still effective, opened him up, and made the judges think that he had actually won that round to send it to a 3rd round...

    now maybe the ufc doesnt really take these shots from the bottom into serious consideration for the scoring and what not but that is a whole other topic... but these shots are not meaningless ineffectve wastes of energy... some of them are just brushed off as nothing but what forrest did while on his back seemed to be more effective to me than what tito did. tito took him down and then couldnt do nehting... forrest delvierd fists/elbows and made his way back to his feet.... aggressiveness does count in scoring and there is no doubt that durin that takedown and time on the ground forrest was much more aggressive.
    well said.
  • 08-26-2006, 05:29 AM
    Kewl144
    Quote Originally Posted by hops69
    what are you the almighty one on UFC kewl? deliverin elbows while on the bottom cant do anything, are inneffective? its funny that you can sit at ur comp screeen and actually type that up.... it amazes me that you can say this. for instance very recently on TUF 4 the one guy was on the bottom and delivered an elbow and busted the guys head open in an instant... while he got dominated thew hole fight that one shot was still effective, opened him up, and made the judges think that he had actually won that round to send it to a 3rd round...
    Did it stop the fight? Nope. Was there anything behind Forrest's elbows from the bottom? Nope.

    now maybe the ufc doesnt really take these shots from the bottom into serious consideration for the scoring and what not but that is a whole other topic...
    Actually that is the topic.

    but these shots are not meaningless ineffectve wastes of energy... some of them are just brushed off as nothing but what forrest did while on his back seemed to be more effective to me than what tito did. tito took him down and then couldnt do nehting... forrest delvierd fists/elbows and made his way back to his feet.... aggressiveness does count in scoring and there is no doubt that durin that takedown and time on the ground forrest was much more aggressive.
    Forrest didnt do anything from his back to improve his position. Instead of trying to strike, he should have focused on getting back to his feet as soon as possible or reversing the position. Forrest may have been more aggressive, but he wasnt in a dominate position, so anything he scored from that position wouldnt have changed anything significantly.
  • 08-26-2006, 05:27 AM
    killerinstinct
    Quote Originally Posted by Kewl144
    The point is you get points for improving your position. Striking from the bottom will not stop a fight and will not improve your position if thats all you do. Its amusing that you dont seem to understand how a MMA fight is scored. Almost as amusing is the fact that you keep saying that Tito was "eating elbows" like they were actually doing any damage. And who cares if you dont like the rule or not, you've shown that you dont even understand how to score, at the very least, a UFC fight but you still want to dispute it.
    To say that elbows from the bottom don't do any damage is ridiculous.Why don't you get on top of a good fighter and let him elbow you to the face and then tell me they don't do damage.Watch Riggs fight with Lytle-elbows from the bottom can end a fight.
  • 08-26-2006, 05:07 AM
    hops69
    what are you the almighty one on UFC kewl? deliverin elbows while on the bottom cant do anything, are inneffective? its funny that you can sit at ur comp screeen and actually type that up.... it amazes me that you can say this. for instance very recently on TUF 4 the one guy was on the bottom and delivered an elbow and busted the guys head open in an instant... while he got dominated thew hole fight that one shot was still effective, opened him up, and made the judges think that he had actually won that round to send it to a 3rd round...

    now maybe the ufc doesnt really take these shots from the bottom into serious consideration for the scoring and what not but that is a whole other topic... but these shots are not meaningless ineffectve wastes of energy... some of them are just brushed off as nothing but what forrest did while on his back seemed to be more effective to me than what tito did. tito took him down and then couldnt do nehting... forrest delvierd fists/elbows and made his way back to his feet.... aggressiveness does count in scoring and there is no doubt that durin that takedown and time on the ground forrest was much more aggressive.
  • 08-26-2006, 04:55 AM
    Kewl144
    Quote Originally Posted by Afro Samurai
    you wanna talk about understanding, you missed the point entirely and overall made yourself look like a jackass with your long and boring posts that no one gives a shit about.
    You didnt have a point other than showing that you dont understand the rules of the UFC.
This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may post attachments
  • You may edit your posts
  •