 | |
06-23-2008, 06:42 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Reputation: 200+
Status: Nite Owl 2 Sans Impotence Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Winston Salem, NC Posts: 230
| Rule Change: Fight Restart?
If this has been brought up before, feel free to delete.
After the CB Amir fight, CB clearly felt it wasn't over, and Amir stood up and acted as if he was willing to keep going. I also think back to the Vera/Werdum fight, and how that was an early stoppage.
As they're meeting to discuss changes to the rules, if both fighters agree that something is an early stoppage, what would people think about a procedure to reverse an early stoppage and restart the fight? It could get complicated, and may require consent of both fighters, both corners, judges and docs, and maybe if one person does something stupid (like CB's tap) they lose a point, but I'd rather deal with some confusion for a minute and have a definitive winner than leave feeling unfinished.
Thoughts?
__________________
Favorites to Watch: Urijah Faber, Rich Clementi, Jeff Monson, Nick Diaz, Babalu, Coture, Fedor, Andrei, Mir
My wife is in med school to become an emergency room physician... http://oversight.house.gov/story.asp?ID=1441...when it comes to what the candidates have actually done, who am I voting for?
|
| |
06-23-2008, 06:56 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Reputation: ∞
Status: @ MMASpot.net Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: VA Posts: 7,189
|
I could see where it would be really nice at times but actually instituting it seems like it would be damn near impossible.
|
| |
06-23-2008, 07:38 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Status: Banned Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 3,070
|
Removing the ability to rule from officials would lead to bad things IMHO.
|
| |
06-23-2008, 07:44 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Reputation: 750+
Status: Neither sick or nasty. Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Philly Posts: 605
|
That is a good point. Although, would there be many fighters that would risk a win to keep fighting?
|
| |
06-23-2008, 07:50 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Reputation: ∞
Status: Royalty Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: nc Posts: 5,291
|
nah i would leave it like it is.its not early stoppage if you tap like cb did.he clearly tapped and the fight was stopped as it should be.guys could tap and say oh no it was a mistake i didnt mean to and have a point deducted by your rule,and get out of a bad position.and have the fight restarted.you would have guys try and manipulate that. if you changed it around like that
__________________ |
| |
06-23-2008, 07:52 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Status: neg'd 4 lyfe Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 10,651
|
I think the refs need to have the power they currently have, to end a fight, to deduct points, to do whatever. But I don't think it should change.
I think refs need to go to school a bit and get trained on consistency, but other than that, I'd focus any restructuring in the 10-point must system and the training of judges.
With a restart, you run the risk of a fighter jumping back into the fight because they don't want to look like a punk, even if they're hurt. It already happens with illegal blows...which is the closest I can come with an analogy because the restart option isn't in effect anywhere else.
After an illegal blow, many fighters start again before they're really ready, and are taking great risks: read the interview with Leites after the Marquardt fight for an example. A host of others restart too quickly because they don't want to look weak.
It would also leave fighters who want to keep the win looking like punks, ala Alessio's views on Brock Larson when Larson couldn't continue after eating an illegal knee to a downed opponent. I'd rather have the fight stopped and if there is enough controversy, there can always be a rematch.
I disagree with a lot of ref/judges decisions [like, how the fuck did Grove get a 10-8 round?] but I respect their training, and the fact that they're human and can make mistakes.
But like H.D. Thoreau, I believe less governement is good government, and I think that applies to MMA with less rules being better than more rules.
rh
__________________ All manner of men came to work for the News: everything from wild young Turks who wanted to rip the world in half and start all over again -- to tired, beer-bellied old hacks who wanted nothing more than to live out their days in peace before a bunch of lunatics ripped the world in half.
Dr. Hunter S. Thompson The Rum Diary |
| |
06-23-2008, 08:02 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Reputation: 750+
Status: Neither sick or nasty. Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Philly Posts: 605
|
Another idea, which is probably not realistic, is to have an immediate rematch on the spot. Like after the Houston Alexander v James Irvin. They both seemed willing to go again. They could have kept the KO in the books and started another fight on the spot. But I guess that does conflict with contracts with number of fights and purses and stuff.
|
| |
06-23-2008, 08:17 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Reputation: ∞
Status: ALPHA Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 4,379
|
CB and Vera Lost... Thats an easy solution getting pummeled and not defending=loss Tapping (even on accident) = Loss. Don't get your self in thoes situation and you will not lose. Pretty easy to me.
|
| |
06-24-2008, 07:10 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Reputation: 175-199
Status: i'm all out of bubblegum Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Pittsburgh Posts: 334
|
CB tapped and whined about it and we all saw he was lying out his teeth. just like in the NFL when the receiver says he caught the ball and he tries to convince the ref. it's all a bunch-o-shit.....lying should be a penalty in the NFL.
reversing the initial decision would make things too hectic....if it became part of the rules you would have instant manipulation. for example, CB's caught in an armbar, he doesn't want his arm to snap in half....guess what, he does a fake tap and Mazagatti seperates them. CB complains that it wasn't a tap. CB now has feeling back in his arm and Mazagatti allows the fight to continue......and we're all hoping CB doesn't win cuz he appears that he just fucked the system! if in place, this rule would get manipulated.
__________________
this sig has been approved by sandywh
"When you submit someone, there is no controversy, there is no doubt, there is only the certainty of the result. You are better than your opponent and he must submit to your technique"
|
| |
06-25-2008, 07:30 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Reputation: 500+
Status: Be water.... Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Away.. Posts: 411
|
I don't think that is a good idea. I agree with some of the previous posts that say it will bring more harm to the fighters. One guy gets rocked, ref stops it, dude gets up and says he is fine, everyone agrees and they re-start the fight. Then he gets really hurt because he was rocked to begin with and then......it is just bad.
__________________ 
Fedor, Rampage, Alistair, Barnett, Werdum, Igor, Maia, Manhoef, Machida.
K-1: Alistair!!! Peter Aerts, Remy Bonjasky, Badr Hari
Fedor could lose all of his remaining fights and will still be the GREATEST FIGHTER OF ALL TIME!!!!
|
| |  | | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:06 AM. |
| Quick Member Login Top 5 Latest Threads Latest MMA News Advertisements |