Originally Posted by rivethead
I've designed the bulk of my tats, but I've had a couple one-offs by artists, I've never signed anything to that effect.
depends on the shop. ive only seen something like that a few times but it does exist. usually about photography and any reproduction without artist permissions and whatever.
Originally Posted by Sniggles
I am quite sure this law was implemented so that people in the relative industry could not copy an artist's work. Not for bastardized use of the law like this.
thats for sure the original purpose of the disclaimer i was talking about. this guy is just trying to make a buck but i think he just might have enough legal ground to make a case