Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 14 of 14

Thread: Non title fights

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    13,279

    Default

    i dont like how prides champ will fight 3 times without putting the belt on the line

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    65

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thelegendrvb
    Yeah the only other time I can see it being a non title fight is if the challenger has to pull out of the fight and all they can find to replace him with is a can. You know someone who really does not deserve a title shot.
    That's a good point. But other than that, a champion must defend his title. Its tough to call someone a champion if they lose and still hold their title.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    13,279

    Default

    i agree everytime a champion goes to fight he should have that belt on the line

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Triggsylvania
    Posts
    3,552

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dibiase
    That's a good point. But other than that, a champion must defend his title. Its tough to call someone a champion if they lose and still hold their title.

    Very true. It is also hard to call someone a champion if they never defend their title.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •