Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Bradley vs. Pacquiao spurs Federal legislation

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    BC, Canada
    Posts
    18,467

    Default Bradley vs. Pacquiao spurs Federal legislation

    Bradley vs. Pacquiao spurs Federal legislation

    Giving voice to the outrage over Timothy Bradley's controversial split decision over Manny Pacquiao, two senators introduced legislation Monday that would create a special boxing commission to oversee all matches in the United States and restore integrity to the sport.

    Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., who boxed while at the U.S. Naval Academy, and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., a former middleweight boxer, are pushing the measure establishing the U.S. Boxing Commission, an entity that would carry out federal boxing law, work with the industry and local commissions and license boxers, promoters, managers and sanctioning organizations.

    Speaking on the Senate floor, McCain evoked the words of former sportswriter Jimmy Cannon, who called boxing the ''red light district of sports.'' He said the recent dispute stemming from the welterweight bout between Bradley and Pacquiao ''is the latest example of the legitimate distrust boxing fans have for the integrity of the sport.''

    ''Clearly, the conspiracy theories and speculation surrounding the fight are given life because there are so many questions surrounding the integrity of the sport and how it is managed in multiple jurisdictions,'' said McCain, who pointed out that professional boxing is the only sport in the United States without a strong, centralized association regulating it.

    Under the legislation, all referees and judges participating in a championship or a professional fight lasting 10 rounds or more would have to be fully registered and licensed by the commission. A sanctioning organization could provide the names of judges and referees it considers qualified for that caliber bout, but only the commission could appoint judges and referees to participate in the matches.
    Bradley vs. Pacquiao spurs Federal legislation - Mixed Martial Arts News
    And if you want beef, then bring the ruckus

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    1,725

    Default

    I respect John McCain a ton, and acknowledge that has an established track record of supporting federal oversight in combat sports, but this is ridiculous. You'd think that politicians would have learned from the outcomes of the Bonds and Clemens trials.

    Sad but true: Voters have short memories, and maybe now, in the heat of the controversy, it's politically favorable to take a fan-friendly position on the Pacquiao fight. But aren't we trying to reduce government spending. Doesn't it cost money even to propose such a stupid idea? Fucking politics.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    16,138

    Default

    Republicans reducing spending?

    Ha.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •