+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Eddie Alvarez's lawyer files injunction against Bellator to fight at UFC 159

  1. Default Eddie Alvarez's lawyer files injunction against Bellator to fight at UFC 159

    Eddie Alvarez's lawyer files injunction against Bellator to fight at UFC 159; UFC strengthens offer - MMAmania.com



    The mixed martial arts (MMA) world will keep its collective eyes on the courtroom this week.

    Eddie Alvarez's attorneys are seeking a preliminary injunction to allow the former Bellator Lightweight Champion and current free agent to sign a Zuffa contract to fight at UFC 159 on April 27, 2013. The court hearing is set for this upcoming Friday (Jan. 25, 2013).

    MMA Payout has the details:

    According to Court papers filed in New Jersey state Court by Alvarez's attorney, Zuffa will not promote or contract with Alvarez until it has Court permission. It has to do so within 90 days of the event. Thus, the deadline is January 27th (the hearing is set for Friday the 25th since the 27th is Sunday).

    The hearing is to show cause as to "why Bellator should not be restrained from interfering with Alvarez's prospective contract with Zuffa and why Alvarez should not be permitted to contract with Zuffa, so that he may participate in Zuffa's April 27, 2013 event.
    As in all preliminary injunctions, the threshold Alvarez's attorneys must prove for the Court to grant the preliminary junction is:

    1) the likelihood of success on the merits;
    2) that Alvarez will suffer irreparable harm if the injunction is denied;
    3) that granting the preliminary relief will not result in even greater harm to the nonmoving party (Bellator); and
    4) that the public interest favors such relief.
    To make things even more interesting, according to a recent report from Sports Illustrated, the UFC has strengthened its initial offer to Eddie Alvarez, clearing up some of the language and guaranteeing him a fight on a pay-per-view (PPV) for his debut with the promotion.

    Here are the details of the new offer:

    "Zuffa currently has a standing offer to Alvarez for a bout at UFC 159 in late April, but has altered its original contract offer to include the pay-per-view revenue perk (in addition to the negotiated $75,000 show and $75, 000 win purses), despite it not being a title fight. According to Alvarez's UFC offer, included in Bellator's complaint, the fighter stands to make an additional $1.00 for every buy between 200,000-400,000 units, $2.00 for each buy sold between 400,000- 600,000 units and $2.50 for each buy sold over 600,000 units."
    This would make things much more difficult for Bellator to match the deal because the promotion does not put any of its events on PPV and the guarantee of a PPV fight would likely get around the tricky language that Bellator used to "match" the initial contract.
    When you're down.... you're down 4-Life


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Greater Toronto Area.
    Posts
    13,814

    Default

    Interesting stuff.

    BFC is being really petty with all of this stuff, because afterall it isn't as though their actions are going to entice Eddie BACK to them.

    I'd say Bellator shoudl save their time and money and focus on their NEW franchise fighter, Michael Chandler.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    with my parents of course
    Posts
    2,617

    Default

    I wonder how much of this is tied up in Bellator's legal department and how much Bjorn really controls? Could he just tell them to drop it? or does he allow that division to do what it does? If Bjorn does have total control of this situation, then shame on him for holding Eddie up. But I suspect the truth is a bit more complicated, perhaps needless so, but still....And who owns Bellator anyway? Did the UFC offer Eddie an immediate title shot? If so then Bellator can't match their offer, pure and simple without compromising it's format.....
    Scarface: Fuck you, fuck you, fuck you, you're cool, and fuck you, I'm out!

    "I don't call the fighting in my films 'violent', I call it 'action'. An action film borders between fantasy and reality. If I were to be completely realistic in my films, you would call me a violent, bloody man. I would simply destroy my opponent by tearing his guts out. I wouldn't do it so artistically." ~Bruce Lee


+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may post attachments
  • You may edit your posts
  •