+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 26 of 26

Thread: Bellator PPV will be $35-$45

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Muskoka, ON
    Posts
    1,635

    Default

    If I wind up not working I will likely buy it. I love the two real title fights...scratch two and put one real title fight, a gifted title shot and a joke title shot along with a joke of a main even that 5 years ago would have been ok. Still Chandler and Alvarez though a gifted title shot is one hell of a fight and to me worth it. So here's hoping I'm off. I am not buying it due to the attempt at a fight between Tito and Rampage.
    FW-Hominick
    LW-Stout, Cerrone, Jim Miller
    WW-GSP, Fitch, Goulet, Rory
    MW-Shlemenko
    LHW-Jones
    HW-Carwin, Barry, Russow

    RRR=the Rhonda Rousey Resistance

    classic - "this is the dumbest thing Ive ever heard. thats like me having a picture of Hitler posted, and saying "I dont believe in his politics, but I like to hear him talk" W.Silva>C.Norris

    HOSS-Bork, you should spend more time brushing up on your MMA history, and less time complementing guys on how young their penises taste.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    BC, Canada
    Posts
    18,549

    Default

    Looks like Bellator PPV buys are not the only ones struggling... One of the UFC's best cards of the year pulled in some shitty numbers:
    Report: UFC 166 pay-per-view buys 'hugely disappointing' following 'low' numbers for UFC 165
    http://www.mmamania.com/2013/10/25/5...appointing-mma

    According to a report by Dave Meltzer in this week's Wrestling Observer newsletter, the past two UFC PPV events have performed under expectations (subscription required, and highly recommended).

    It’s far too early to get an accurate PPV number, but the early trends are, at least to me, hugely disappointing. When Jones vs. Alexander Gustafsson did far lower than any Jones show to date, it had the built in excuse of being one week after Mayweather vs. Alvarez. While the boxing/MMA crossover isn’t that large, that event, when you’re talking 2.2 million buys at $75 a head and the fight that everyone was talking about, that is the exception. Dana White has said that the number (which he wouldn’t reveal) was better than he expected, but he’s also a bigger boxing fan than most.

    Various sources have pegged it as lower than the Juan Manuel Marquez vs. Timothy Bradley boxing match seven nights earlier. No national number has been released for that fight either. Like with Jones, this based on earliest samples, looks to be the lowest Velasquez main event. That’s saying something since his last fight was with Bigfoot Silva, who he had massacred a year earlier, and was on a show with a strong undercard.

    Although, as Meltzer pointed out elsewhere in his Observer article, 2013 is on pace to be UFC's most profitable year on PPV since the blockbuster numbers they did in 2010, the low buy rates for UFC 165 and UFC 166 beg the question why so many fans weren't buying what the company was attempting to sell them this past fall.

    There are a number of possible mitigating factors potentially at work here. Obviously being scheduled one week after the Floyd Mayweather vs. Canelo Alvarez bout did UFC 165 no favors, but unlike a Mayweather fight, Marquez vs. Bradley wasn't the type of event where the whole world stops and pays attention. It should have had a negligible effect on UFC 166.

    UFC's move last August from the highly-rated cable powerhouse FX to the start-up FOX Sports 1 also needs to be considered. With UFC Countdown and "Primetime" specials now being viewed by a far smaller audience, it logically follows that PPV would take somewhat of a hit.

    However, if one looks for a common denominator between UFC 165 and UFC 166, the thing that immediately comes to mind is the lukewarm job of promotion the main event fighters did for both shows.

    Jon Jones was so dismissive of Alexander Gustafsson in the weeks leading up to their light heavyweight title tilt at UFC 165, that every time he opened his mouth he seemed to reinforce the widespread belief Gustafsson had no chance against him. The "Mauler" gave decidedly lackadaisical interviews himself, which left fans with little reason to want to see him fight Jones other than that he was logically the next guy in line given his long winning streak.

    Velasquez and dos Santos fared no better in the pre-fight excitement department. Although Velasquez may be perhaps the greatest heavyweight in UFC history inside the cage, outside it he's one of the dullest interviews the division has ever seen.

    Junior Dos Santos was slightly better than Velasquez in explaining why fans should care about UFC 166 -- how could he not be -- but his story that he had over-trained before his loss to Velasquez at UFC 155 late last year, and would come in at 100 percent this time, just wasn't enough to convince fans of the necessity of purchasing the rubber match between the two.

  3. #23

    Default

    I just can't believe they're pushing Tito/Rampage over Chandler/Alvarez. I honestly would have considered buying it if wasn't billed as wash up vs wash up. Just doesn't sit right with me.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    1,904

    Default

    Surprised no thread for Bellator tonight, some pretty good fights again. Nasty cut in the last fight, not sure what the doctor was doing when he kept stretching the cut open.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    16,138

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cat--Smasher View Post
    Looks like Bellator PPV buys are not the only ones struggling... One of the UFC's best cards of the year pulled in some shitty numbers:
    Report: UFC 166 pay-per-view buys 'hugely disappointing' following 'low' numbers for UFC 165
    http://www.mmamania.com/2013/10/25/5...appointing-mma
    Both companies overprice their product.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Sackville N.B
    Posts
    3,019

    Default

    ...and it's free

    Quote Originally Posted by AnchorPunch View Post
    So if I don't sin, when I die, I go to Canada? Right?

+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may post attachments
  • You may edit your posts
  •